Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Intelligent Design" Denies Dr. Gonzalez of University Tenure
Discovery Institute ^ | May 18, 2007 | John West

Posted on 05/18/2007 10:44:13 PM PDT by MatthewTan

Breaking News: Iowa State Department Faculty Acknowledge ID Played Role in Gonzalez's Tenure Denial

According to a story to be published in the May 26 edition of World Magazine (already available online here), two faculty members of the department that denied tenure to Guillermo Gonzales at Iowa State University have admitted that his work on ID played a role in the denial. While Prof. Eli Rosenberg, Chair of the Department of Physics and Astronomy, insisted to the magazine that intelligent design "was not an overriding factor" (emphasis added), he then conceded according to the magazine that Gonzalez's pro-ID book The Privileged Planet "played into the decision-making process. He also explained that the reputation of a professor among others in his field is a significant factor." Of course, if "reputation" is used as a code word for whether one's views are popular among fellow scientists, then this is another way anti-ID bias entered into the decision.

But Rosenberg is not the only department member who admitted that intelligent design played a role in the tenure decision.

ISU astronomy professor Curtis Struck told World that he was not surprised at the denial of tenure to Gonzales because "[h]e includes some things in his astronomy resumé that other people regard as taking a coincidence too far." Struck was obviously referring to Gonzalez's arguments for intelligent design.

Struck's comments mean that at least three of the five tenured astronomers in Gonzalez's department have now been tied to anti-ID bias. As noted earlier this week, another tenured astronomer in the department signed a statement circulated by the National Center for Science Education denouncing intelligent design as "creationist pseudoscience," while the husband of a third astronomy professor signed the same statement.

Despite his own admission, Prof. Rosenberg tried to do damage control by claiming that there was something deficient about Dr. Gonzalez's sterling research record: "You take a look at somebody's research record over the six-year probationary period and you get a sense whether this is a strong case. Clearly, this was a case that looked like it might be in trouble." Really? Was Gonzalez somehow derelict in publishing 350% more peer-reviewed publications than his own department's stated standard for research excellence? Or in co-authoring a college astronomy textbook with Cambridge University Press? Or in having his research recognized in Science, Nature, Scientific American, and other top science publications?

It is worth pointing out that in early 2004 Gonzalez's department nominated him for an "Early Achievement in Research" award for an outstanding record in research. So what changed between 2004 and 2006 when Gonzalez submitted his tenure application? Well, 2004 was the year The Privileged Planet was published. Dr. Gonzalez continued to publish peer-reviewed journal articles, and even co-authored the Cambridge University Press textbook in 2006, but his department seems to have soured on him just as the controversy over intelligent design heated up on the ISU campus and around the nation. Coincidence... or design?

Isn't the answer obvious?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: gonzalez; intelligentdesign; iowa; tenure
The founders of modern science like Copernicus and Galileo and Kepler and Newton himself believed that the universe was the product of a mind, that it was intelligible to beings like ourselves because the universe itself was the product of an intelligent being.

Intelligent Design asserts that the universe is more than matter and energy, that your intelligence is more than atoms and molecules and electrical waves.

Intelligent Design asserts that we are in the era of matter+energy+intelligence.

The distinguished French biologist Pierre Grasse says of DNA, "This intelligence is sine qua non of living things".

Paul Davies, “Our ability to understand and discern the universe is a fundamental part of what makes the universe tick, so that we are linked into it. This isn’t just an accident, to be a trivial little byproduct; it is linked to the great cosmic scheme of things. Now, I have no idea how that linkage works, why it’s there, or anything of that sort, but I am very, very struck by the fact that we can understand the universe in such exquisite detail at such a deep level.”

Logic and reason sustains the entire universe.

This is not about any religion. It is about rationality in the universe. The physics and mathematical equations tell us so.

ID is science just as materialism is science. If ID is not science, then materialism is not science and has to be banished from science classrooms. ID theorists have been discriminated and denied tenure.

Read more about ID

Read Gonzalez's works

Support Gonzalez. Support academic freedom. Let the science of ID challenge the science of materialism.

1 posted on 05/18/2007 10:44:16 PM PDT by MatthewTan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan
MatthewTan
Since May 14, 2007

Hummm... newbie... doggedly, dogmatically, relentlessly posts about one topic and one topic only.

To comment, or not to comment, that is the question.

NOT !

or was that zot?

2 posted on 05/18/2007 11:03:43 PM PDT by David_G_Burnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan

Yeah, but it’s not about science. Try as you may, you cannot redefine science to suit your so-called rationale.


3 posted on 05/18/2007 11:10:36 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David_G_Burnet
Mr. Tan’s newbie status is a non issue for me (at least), given the quality of the post. Academia has suffered under the oppression of liberal bias for far too long. Got a problem with that?
4 posted on 05/18/2007 11:12:43 PM PDT by zeller the zealot (Are Republicans the Party of Life, or is that too risky?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeller the zealot

LOL


5 posted on 05/19/2007 1:49:40 AM PDT by David_G_Burnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan

Gonzalez is going to be a very wealthy in the not too distant future.


6 posted on 05/19/2007 2:02:01 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan
Which universities have granted tenure to known IDers? Know at the time of tenure offer rather than revealed after tenure.

I do not know of any.

7 posted on 05/19/2007 2:40:06 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon ("An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David_G_Burnet

And exactly how long do you have to be a member before intelligence is bestowed, I find your post highly insulting and irrelevant.


8 posted on 05/19/2007 5:04:45 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan
ID is science just as materialism is science. If ID is not science, then materialism is not science and has to be banished from science classrooms. ID theorists have been discriminated and denied tenure.

ID is not science. Science deals with the natural world.

ID looks at the natural world, finds something we can't currently explain and makes the great and illogical leap to the supernatural.

And you claim that ID is science?


Reminds me of Clarke's Third Law:

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Source.


9 posted on 05/19/2007 8:03:07 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan

I don’t have a problem with ID as long as the Intelligence behind the design is specified. If it is as likely to be the Flying Spaghetti Monster as it is the invisible man in the sky of ancient desert-dweller mythology, I can respect that.

When I read where Discovery Institute disavows belief in the God of the bible, I’ll take ID seriously.


10 posted on 05/19/2007 11:30:22 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
ID does not speculate about who the designer is. That's not within the scope of ID Science. ID is about detection about intelligence, just like SETI is detection about aliens.

Support Gonzalez. Support academic freedom. The Privileged Planet;Observational Astronomy Combat materialism. Read more on ID

11 posted on 05/20/2007 8:45:22 AM PDT by MatthewTan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MatthewTan

You don’t believe that and neither do I.


12 posted on 05/20/2007 8:54:13 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
When have I ever said that I don't believe in what? I believe in angels of God. They could be the "aliens" giving us messages detectable by some physical or spiritual processes. Read this about detection of intelligence in DNA and protein structure.

Complex Specified Information - It’s not that hard to understand

Support Gonzalez. Support academic freedom. The Privileged Planet;Observational Astronomy Combat materialism. Read more on ID

13 posted on 05/20/2007 11:55:30 PM PDT by MatthewTan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson