Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton aide forfeits law license in Justice probe [Samuel R. Berger........]
Washington Times ^

Posted on 05/17/2007 1:36:45 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Clinton aide forfeits law license in Justice probe

By Jerry Seper THE WASHINGTON TIMES May 17, 2007

Samuel R. Berger, the Clinton White House national security adviser who was caught taking highly classified documents from the National Archives, has agreed to forfeit his license to practice law.

In a written statement issued by Larry Breuer, Mr. Berger's attorney, the former national security adviser said he pleaded guilty in the Justice Department investigation, accepted the penalties sought by the department and recognized that his law license would be affected.

"I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license," he said. "While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize."

In giving up his license, Mr. Berger avoids being cross-examined by the Board on Bar Counsel, where he risked further disclosure of specific details of his theft. The agreement is expected to be formalized today.

Mr. Berger, national security adviser from 1997 to 2001, was convicted of removing documents from the Archives in 2005 while preparing to testify before the September 11 commission.

Fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and barred from access to classified material for three years, he also was ordered to undergo a polygraph test if asked -- although the Justice Department has declined to administer the test despite urging by Rep. Thomas M. Davis III of Virginia, ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Governmental Reform.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonista; sandyburglar; traitor; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2007 1:36:48 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No news here, its Alberto Gonzalas who is the criminal.


2 posted on 05/17/2007 1:40:24 AM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and barred from access to classified material for three years,

Ought to be able to serve Mrs. Clinton is a couple of years.

3 posted on 05/17/2007 1:40:31 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Finally, global warming, the sun has come out after weeks of rain, maybe I won't be planting rice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and barred from access to classified material for three years,

Ought to be able to serve Mrs. Clinton (correction) is -should be *in* a couple of years.

4 posted on 05/17/2007 1:41:36 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Finally, global warming, the sun has come out after weeks of rain, maybe I won't be planting rice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"In giving up his license, Mr. Berger avoids being cross-examined by the Board on Bar Counsel, where he risked further disclosure of specific details of his theft. "

Was this also of Bill Clinton before independent counsel? Hmmm...

5 posted on 05/17/2007 1:42:23 AM PDT by endthematrix (a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. - Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Huh. Look for the corrupt-to-the-core Bush Justice Department to step in and plead Sandy’s case to the bar while asking that Sandy be spared the need to testify.


6 posted on 05/17/2007 1:47:05 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I think it’s Lanny Breuer, not Larry.


7 posted on 05/17/2007 1:49:52 AM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Berger should still be in a stockade somewhere in ankle chains.


8 posted on 05/17/2007 1:50:45 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (NBC News - the preferred network of assassins and terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
When was the last time he practiced law? IIRC, he’s a consultant and lobbyist.
9 posted on 05/17/2007 1:51:11 AM PDT by endthematrix (a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. - Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Can someone just make him say WHY he stuffed documents down his pants? Why is this so impossible for us to do?


10 posted on 05/17/2007 1:51:44 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Did he also lose his dental hygienist license?
11 posted on 05/17/2007 1:52:39 AM PDT by iowamark (What if the Right said Fred?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

I would say neither party is really interested in further discussion of the utter incompetence that led to 9/11.


12 posted on 05/17/2007 2:00:02 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

“Can someone just make him say WHY he stuffed documents down his pants? Why is this so impossible for us to do”?


He knows nasty things about too many people. He is set financially for life, just a little slap on the wrist, and he’ll go away and keep his mouth shut.


13 posted on 05/17/2007 2:00:48 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Aren’t criminals who accept plea bargains obligated to tell why they did the crimes? Nothing this moron knows could possibly hurt George Bush. If it could, Berger would have said it years ago.


14 posted on 05/17/2007 2:07:24 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Big whoop...

Like he’s gonna starve to death or end up on the streets without it.

This whole story stinks and is one of the biggest reasons for my discontent with the Bush administration. Why in the name of Ned wasn’t he hammered?

Opps, yeah... those 500 FBI files the Clintons stole.


15 posted on 05/17/2007 2:07:31 AM PDT by Ronin (Ut iusta esse, lex noblis severus necesse est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Able Danger down the memory hole...
16 posted on 05/17/2007 2:07:38 AM PDT by endthematrix (a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. - Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
In giving up his license, Mr. Berger avoids being cross-examined by the Board on Bar Counsel, where he risked further disclosure of specific details of his theft.

Fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and barred from access to classified material for three years, he also was ordered to undergo a polygraph test if asked -- although the Justice Department has declined to administer the test despite urging by Rep. Thomas M. Davis III of Virginia, ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Governmental Reform.

This stinks to high heaven. Berger and Clinton are traitors and should be held responsible for 9-11, especially in light of these charges.

The American people should be demanding justice and a thorough investigation, no matter what democrats it exposes.

I'm pretty pissed off right now.

17 posted on 05/17/2007 2:16:52 AM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
On a search for news using the keyword "Berger" I find that the only paper covering the story at this time in the morning is the "Washington Times" Oh well, maybe the "Main Stream Media" will pick op on it as the day wears on.

Liberal Bias? Nah! Couldn't be that.

18 posted on 05/17/2007 2:19:11 AM PDT by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

That wasn’t a “slap on the wrist”. It was a love pat on the fanny.


19 posted on 05/17/2007 2:19:39 AM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: StACase
I sure do wish this place had a better edit function. I ran that post through Microsoft Word's spell checker and I still missed op = up.

Didn't see it until it was too late.

20 posted on 05/17/2007 2:23:42 AM PDT by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson