What do you want to argue? My view is similar to the board’s view. They evaluated the facts. All the facts, not just the selective ones Wolfowitz and his clique highlighted for their own selfish benefit.
It was stupid for him to accept the top job at a place where his girlfriend was working in the first place.
. . .
What do you want to argue? My view is similar to the board’s view.
OK, I'll admit that I have not read the board's actual report, rather I have only seen news reports about it. I'll have to get my hands on a copy - I'm especially looking forward to reading the part where the board boils down the entire incident and blames it on "a guy who couldn't keep it in his pants"...