Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays take Connecticut to court
The Washington Times ^ | May 15, 2007 | AP staff

Posted on 05/15/2007 1:41:09 PM PDT by Baladas

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- An attorney for eight homosexual couples told the Connecticut Supreme Court yesterday that their constitutional rights have been violated by the state's refusal to grant them marriage licenses.

Connecticut was the first state to allow civil unions without court pressure, but the couples say that's not enough. They want the court to rule that the state's marriage law is unconstitutional because it applies only to heterosexual couples, effectively denying homosexual couples the financial, social and emotional benefits of marriage.

"What is denied to these families is something that goes to the heart of equal protection, which is the right to be part of the fabric of society when they are just the same as other couples and other families," said their attorney, Bennett Klein. Assistant Attorney General Jane Rosenberg, representing the state, argued that civil unions give homosexual couples the same rights by state law as married couples. "

[The question] is, really, is the legislature constitutionally required to use the word 'marriage' when it's referring to the package of rights and benefits it has given to same-sex couples. And the answer is clearly no," Miss Rosenberg said. Arguments wrapped up after about three hours yesterday, and the justices are expected to rule later this year. Lawyers on both sides say a decision in the couples' favor could have nationwide implications for states that have adopted or are considering civil-union-like legislation.

Only Massachusetts allows same-sex couples to "marry." Connecticut, Vermont, California, New Jersey, Maine and Washington have laws allowing either civil unions or domestic partnerships, with New Hampshire set to join in January. Hawaii extends certain spousal rights to same-sex couples and cohabiting heterosexual pairs.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: ct; incrementalism; litigation; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Civil unions always have been used as a stepping-stone to the goal of full legal recognition of same-sex marriages.
1 posted on 05/15/2007 1:41:14 PM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baladas
Incremental-ism! They got “civil unions” and that is not enough.
2 posted on 05/15/2007 1:42:59 PM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The Asst. A.G. is right. But what they want is for the state to go after the Catholic Church. They will first go after the Immaculate in Waterbury where Fr. McGivney started the KOC.


3 posted on 05/15/2007 1:44:24 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

This is precisely why I oppose civil unions. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.


4 posted on 05/15/2007 1:45:56 PM PDT by Sister_T (The Axis of Idiocy: The LameStream Media, The DemocRATS and the "peaceful" anti-war moonbats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

CT PING!


5 posted on 05/15/2007 1:46:51 PM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

I used to support the idea of Civil Unions... I’m strongly reconsidering my position.


6 posted on 05/15/2007 1:47:17 PM PDT by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
...but the couples say that's not enough.

It's NEVER enough! No matter what the subject, with the Left it's never ever enough!......Welfare to Medicare, Never ever enough!..........

7 posted on 05/15/2007 1:48:06 PM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

It basically is the sexual fetish crowd asking the courts to make a scientific conclusion that homosexual behavior is a status not a behavior.

This makes about as much sense as asking a judge to judicially declare the value of Pi is 3.0 just to be fair.


8 posted on 05/15/2007 1:49:09 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

I would give them marriage with absolutely NO DIVORCES allowed! See how well they like it then!...........


9 posted on 05/15/2007 1:49:14 PM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy; BlackElk

I thought Fr. McGivney started K of C at St. Mary’s in New Haven?

I weep when I think of what my home state has become. I can never go back (except for pizza).


10 posted on 05/15/2007 1:53:52 PM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
..."What is denied to these families...

These are not families. Another little lie said enough...

11 posted on 05/15/2007 1:54:14 PM PDT by Inquisitive1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inquisitive1

The lawyer is basically saying that family should be defined as a matter of law rather than biology.

IOW the law should have the power to determine all for all. This homosexual “status” debate is just a useful idiot tool for those who want to set the courts as the arbiters of your life. The village speaks and you must obey.


12 posted on 05/15/2007 1:57:25 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

You’re right, he was ordained at the IC.


13 posted on 05/15/2007 1:59:54 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The very definition of “Give ‘em an inch...”


14 posted on 05/15/2007 2:07:41 PM PDT by USArmySpouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

No, the lawyer is using the time-tested Hitler method to humanize perverts.


15 posted on 05/15/2007 2:20:07 PM PDT by Inquisitive1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hophead; Sister_T
Part of "recognizing" gay marriage means close your eyes to the fact that they are not man and woman... like that's only a small detail.

How does one recognize anything by closing one's eyes?

16 posted on 05/15/2007 2:44:04 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sittnick; massgopguy; Tax-chick; sitetest
Immaculate Conception Church in Waterbury is probably the most spectacularly lovely Roman Catholic Church in Connecticut but it had nothing to do with Fr. Michael McGivney or with the founding of the Knights of Columbus.

I am a member of the Knights of Columbus. When I lived in Connecticut, I was a member of St. Mary's Church on Hillhouse Avenue in New Haven. Fr. McGivney was a parish priest there when he founded the Knights of Columbus in the basement meeting hall. The first K of C Council was San Salvador Council #1 which still exists at a different location. Within a few years after the K of C was founded, St. Mary's Church became a Dominican Church (1880s). It had been built in about 1849 and is the second oldest Catholic Church in Connecticut (to the slightly older St. Mary's Church in Windsor Locks).

When the Dominicans took over, Fr. McGivney became pastor of a parish at Thomaston, Connecticut. There he contracted tuberculosis and died of it at a relatively early age (late 30s?). Fr. McGivney's mortal remains were removed from his grave at Thomaston and entombed in a marble sarcophagus at St. Mary's Church in New Haven (left rear of the Church). The Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus is headquartered to this day in downtown New Haven and the K of C paid for a very first rate restoration (costing millions of dollars) and enhancement of St. Mary's Church at New Haven about 20 years ago.

Fr. McGivney's cause for sainthood is pending and I believe that a St. Mary's Dominican priest, Fr. Gabriel O'Donnell, is in charge of advancing that cause.

17 posted on 05/15/2007 3:52:15 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Dear BlackElk,

“There he contracted tuberculosis and died of it at a relatively early age (late 30s?).”

That’s about right. He died two days after his 38th birthday, the day before the Feast of the Assumption of Mary.

Vivat Jesus!


GK-Elect S/K sitetest, PGK

18 posted on 05/15/2007 3:56:34 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I believe that a St. Mary's Dominican priest, Fr. Gabriel O'Donnell, is in charge of advancing that cause

Father O'Donnell is the postulator for Fr. McGivney's cause, and I'm sure he's a Dominican. Whether he's on staff at St. Mary's, I don't know. He looks rather elderly in his pictures ;-).

19 posted on 05/15/2007 4:03:13 PM PDT by Tax-chick (We're all gonna die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
The Asst. A.G. is right. But what they want is for the state to go after the Catholic Church. They will first go after the Immaculate in Waterbury where Fr. McGivney started the KOC.

That's the one I attend....and believe me, the people here will stand behind our Pastor in not allowing homosexual weddings to be performed in the Church, no matter what the courts rule.

20 posted on 05/17/2007 12:12:23 PM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson