Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toll road compromise reached (Texas)
Austin American Statesman ^ | 5/14/07 | Ben Wear

Posted on 05/14/2007 7:48:00 AM PDT by Cat loving Texan

Toll road compromise reached

By Ben Wear | Monday, May 14, 2007, 08:10 AM

Lawmakers, representatives from the Texas Department of Transportation and others have reached agreement on major toll road legislation that will be laid out this morning in a meeting of the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

But there could be a backlash. Many legislators had said this session that what they didn’t want was to be presented with a large “agreed-upon” transportation bill late in the session with little or no time to absorb it.

That’s exactly what they’re getting, however.

The bill, in this instance, is SB 792, which was the original twin bill to HB 1892. It is now more than 80 pages long, and only a handful of legislators have seen it so far.

If you don’t remember, HB 1892 was overwhelmingly approved by both the House and the Senate (combined vote: 166-5) and is sitting on Gov. Rick Perry’s desk awaiting action. He has until later this week to decide what to do.

But while it’s been sitting there, Perry and the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration have been busy attacking the bill, and Perry has made it clear he would veto HB 1892. The bill would threaten Texas’ federal highway funds, they say, and kill any chance of building Interstate 69 in South Texas. That barrage, along with some technical errors in HB 1892, were enough to bring sponsor state Sen. Tommy Williams, R-The Woodlands, and state Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas, chairman of the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee, back to the table. Those senators, along with the Transportation Department and various other people, spent the last part of last week and the weekend, doing major surgery on SB 792.

Their handiwork will be introduced this morning in Carona’s committee at 10 a.m. as an alternative to HB 1892. If SB 792 makes a lightning run through the Legislature this week, as its new advocates desire, then HB 1892 would be recalled by the Legislature. Or Perry, if he runs out of time, could just veto it, leaving the Legislature to choose between a veto override and SB 792. Or doing nothing at all, even after all the noise this session.

So what does SB 792 do?

** It allows private toll road contracts to last 50 years, instead of 40 years as in HB 1892, and up to 70 years under current law.

** It exempts some more roads from the two-year moratorium on private toll road contracts, including Texas 99 near Houston and I-69 south of Interstate 37. South Texans, believing Perry’s claim that HB 1892 would kill any chance for that road, demanded this.

** It changes language in HB 1892 that would have allowed the state to buy back a profitable toll road from a private company based primarily on what the company had invested in the road. Instead, the buyback amount would be based on original estimates of toll revenue for the life of the project. This would be higher price generally than under HB 1892, but lower than under current law for successful toll roads.

** It fixes a mistake in HB 1892 which would have directly all money from multi-billion concession payments for the Texas 121 tollway to Dallas. Under this bill, the money would be allocated to both the Dallas and Fort Worth areas.

** The Harris County Toll Road Authority, which under HB 1892 would have gotten right of way free from the state for some new tollways, will have to pay the state its the original cost to the state of getting the land. However, those payments will stay in the Houston area for other road projects.

** In a completely new section, all future toll road projects would undergo a “market valuation” by a third-party to determine what their value might be in up-front concession payments. Then the local toll road agency would have first shot at doing the project as long as it could raise that up-front money.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cdas; compromise; cuespookymusic; dallas; dfw; exemptions; fhwa; fortworth; hb1892; hctra; highwayfunding; highways; houston; i69; ih69; interstate69; legislature; metroplex; moratorium; opposition; override; p3; ppp; privatefunding; privateinvestment; privatesector; privatization; rickperry; roads; sb792; sh121; sh99; texas; texas121; texas99; texashouse; texassenate; tollroads; tolls; tollways; transportation; transportationbill; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc69; tx; txdot; veto
So we only are going to get screwed for 30 years. Yip, yip yahoo!
1 posted on 05/14/2007 7:48:11 AM PDT by Cat loving Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

BOHICA — bend over, here it comes again!


2 posted on 05/14/2007 8:06:06 AM PDT by pikachu (Breakfast is the most important beer of the day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pikachu
The one thing I do not understand is why are we contracting outside financing and contracting for this road? If a Spanish firm can raise the capitol and manage this, why in the hell can we not do this here in Texas ourselves?

There is no doubt we need this road. There is a lot of doubt in my mind about which political entities benefit from this today. The potential for enormous corruption and kick backs exist in the project.

3 posted on 05/14/2007 8:43:07 AM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; Ben Ficklin

Appears a bill may be forthcoming.......


4 posted on 05/14/2007 8:55:53 AM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


5 posted on 05/14/2007 9:00:20 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


6 posted on 05/14/2007 9:15:31 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
** It fixes a mistake in HB 1892 which would have directly all money from multi-billion concession payments for the Texas 121 tollway to Dallas. Under this bill, the money would be allocated to both the Dallas and Fort Worth areas.

Collin County legislators sell out again.

7 posted on 05/14/2007 9:15:35 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

bump.


8 posted on 05/14/2007 9:22:35 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport
"Or doing nothing at all, even after all the noise this session."

I vote for that.

9 posted on 05/14/2007 9:42:34 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

“I vote for that.”

That’s a good bet. They have an enormous amount on their plates for the next 2 weeks.

There’s going to be some hell-raising if this bill passes.


10 posted on 05/14/2007 1:05:19 PM PDT by wolfcreek (DON'T MESS WITH A NATION IN NEED OF MEDICATION !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson