Clinton watchers will not be surprised by any of the revelations, but will find some new material. For example, "the Clinton campaign lives in constant fear of another problem: bimbo eruptions from the bimbos he has been picking up with in retirement."
Enjoy.
I’m sure HRC has nightmares that Bill will do something else stupid before the 08 election.
The most destructive set of sociopaths in American history.
A blast from the past speculating about the tapes:
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3786c5344c3f.htm
"There are different agencies in the government that make it their business to tape certain things for certain reasons, and it was one of those agencies" that did the taping, Kyl said. "Incidentally, it may have been more than one of those agencies," he added.
Kyl said of the sources: "They are people who claim to have information about those tapes, who by virtue of who they are have some credibility with respect to the information they have come forward about."
When asked whether the sources were members of U.S. intelligence, Kyl said, "You can assume that they are people who at some period in time have been in the employ of the federal government." ...
On the first day of President Clinton's Senate trial, Washington Post columnist Jim Hoagland dropped a bombshell which, if pursued, could result in Clinton's conviction and removal from office. He urged the Senate to examine "one corner" of the Lewinsky scandal that hasn't gotten much attention. He wrote, "Clinton recognized in a telephone conversation with his young paramour that foreign intelligence organizations could, without much trouble, be listening in on their phone sex and other musings, according to Lewinsky's detailed and unchallenged testimony."
"n his January 14 column, Hoagland, a Washington insider, went on to say, "What then did the president do to protect himself, and national security, from blackmail and damage, other than propose an absurd cover story to Monica?"
Does this sound like something that might come close to a high crime and misdemeanor? You bet. This Hoagland column has given Senate Republicans a softball they should hit out of the park. This is the break they needed to transform the case into a demonstrable crime against the Constitution. With the national security angle factored in, they can now argue for conviction on the ground that the Clinton conspiracy to conceal his relationship with Lewinsky was actually an effort to prevent the Congress and the public from discovering how a foreign intelligence service may have penetrated the White House.
A vote to convict the president then becomes a vote for protecting the national security of the U.S. Members of the U.S. Senate, if they take their own oaths seriously, should vigorously pursue this line of inquiry. If Clinton is called as a witness, he should be asked directly whether he was concerned at all about his illicit affair threatening national security. Thus, Clinton can be exposed before the American people as someone who put his own sexual appetite before the national security of the U.S. (and)...he is callous toward the "people's business" he claims to be so busy on.
This line of attack has the potential to turn the charge of "sexual McCarthyism" on its head. It will demonstrate to the American people that sexual perversion, of the kind practiced by the president, must be considered when it involves people with access to our most sensitive secrets.
The big questions: which foreign intelligence agency or agencies monitored the affair? And what did they do with this blackmail material? Was Clinton blackmailed? And how did Lewinsky get a top-secret clearance in the Pentagon anyway?
Hoagland's attention to this matter is welcome, but it is actually an old story. Independent counsel Kenneth Starr had reported that, according to Lewinsky, the president had "told her that he suspected that a foreign embassy (he did not specify which one) was tapping his telephones, and he proposed cover stories. If ever questioned, she should say that the two of them were just friends. If anyone ever asked about their phone sex, she should say that they knew their calls were being monitored all along, and the phone sex was just a put-on."
Tyrrell was interviewed by Brian Lamb on CSPAN. He told how he was sitting with a bunch of Clinton cronies at a party. One asked what he did and he told them he is a writer. They asked if he’d written anything they might know and he told them he wrote Finnegan’s Wake. They believed him. His conclusion was that the crew surrounding Bill is not nearly as smart as they believe they are.
Bill is a sociopath
Hellary is just a manipulating control freak
Tyrell: This is the most important theme of the book. Both are 1960s lefties. They are narcissists. Self-love propels them through life and often amusingly so. A major theme is that the 1960s generation was the most momentous of the twentieth century. The left-wing of that generation has been competing with those of us who are from the right-wing of the 1960s generation for decades. I talk about how the two sides have variously taken over the politics of the country. Now in 2008 we shall see the last great battle of this intragenerational war. It is going to be a tremendous battle. It already is.
This article brings back a lot of memories from the early days of FR. The fact that the Clintons have achieved the highest office in the land speaks volumes of the cultural decline of America. God be with us.
THe 43% of the voters who made this amusing fellow our president would not care if he had sexually assaulted Mother Theresa on the steps of the Supreme Court Building. Of course those convos between him and Monica were taped by a "Foreign Intelligence" Agency. Of course Vince Foster was murdered. Of course so was Ron Brown, and of course he had three chances to take out Osama (almost wrote Obama) bin Ladin.
None of that matters. Bill Clinton is not a man. He is an Icon. Taking his cue from JFK, he devoterd O say, an hour and half to two hours a day to "running" the country and the rest to PArty time and party time.Guy's a friggin' genius.
By my reckoning, if the Republican Party were to suddenly wake from its long slumber upon W's retirement to Texas, we could repair clinton's damage to our nation in about 50 years of hard work. Of course, if his wife is somehow elected, we gotta problem.
Clinton was a serial rapist and as the archives of this forum detail illegally received campaign donations from the Chinese government. That said, he never disappointed me, who he was, was evident from the start. He was raised by a party girl-whore for the political criminal element in Hot Springs Arkansas and politics and crime were one in the same. On the other hand Bush has disappointed me, in some ways he has given Teddy Kennedy more than Clinton ever did, No Child Left Behind, Prescription Drugs, and support for Amnesty for illegals. While Clinton played the Red Chinese game for his own gain, I have never figured out why Bush has given so much of this country to Mexico and its illegal invasion for nothing.