I quit reading right there.
Any application of logic is purely accidental.
If even those civilians now in possession of legally owned firearms were allowed the full scope of their Second Amendment protected Rights, we would be an order of magnitude safer than we are now.
It has the added benefit of not expanding government, would not require additional expenditure, and is the only real solution to our Nations crime and security issues.
This cannot be refuted rationally...
Armed Americans - A clock smashing hammer!
Arnaud has gone completely over the edge.
Will wonders never cease.
"Fighting the terrorists over there so they wouldn't come over here was a popular refrain. Now, the stats tell a totally different story.
Terrorist incidents have increased sevenfold since Saddam was overthrown. Pointing to the increasing use of suicide car and truck and chemical bombs, the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) said casualties from terrorist strikes rose 40 percent in 2006 compared to 2005. The NCTC stats also said there had been a 91 percent increase in attacks in the Middle East and South Asia"
The article proves the expectation that we could fight "the terrorists over there so they wouldn't come over here."
Ipso dumbo.
Does that drooling old coot really believe that NOT going into Iraq would have made us safer?