To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; LdSentinal; SDGOP; Last Dakotan; jazusamo; nutmeg; ...
If he actually goes through with it, he could be a BIG problem.
3 posted on
05/04/2007 7:43:41 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(If the GOP were to stop worshiping Free Trade as if it were a religion, they'd win every election)
To: Clintonfatigued
6 posted on
05/04/2007 7:44:49 PM PDT by
digger48
To: Clintonfatigued
Good for Hagel. He’ll split the moonbat vote and give Thompson an even bigger margin of victory. Conservatives aren’t going to vote for him.
To: Clintonfatigued
BS. Hagel is a non-entity with little national name recognition.
10 posted on
05/04/2007 7:46:06 PM PDT by
kabar
To: Clintonfatigued
Problem to who? I will say to the democrats more than to the Republicans.
11 posted on
05/04/2007 7:46:18 PM PDT by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Clintonfatigued
If he actually goes through with it, he could be a BIG problem.
:::
Another Ross Perot ???
15 posted on
05/04/2007 7:49:14 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: Clintonfatigued
A Bloomberg/Hagel ticket?
To: Clintonfatigued
"If he actually goes through with it, he could be a BIG problem."Who in the hell would vote for him? He may attract a few conservative dems and perhaps a couple of country club republicans, who probably voted for John Kerry anyway.
40 posted on
05/04/2007 8:07:35 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republians - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
To: Clintonfatigued
If he actually goes through with it, he could be a BIG problem. For the Democrats. Just as John Anderson siphoned off more Democrat than Republican votes, so too will Hagel.
59 posted on
05/05/2007 2:28:33 PM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson