Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives for Hillary?
Real Clear Politics ^ | 05/01/07 | Bruce Bartlett

Posted on 05/01/2007 5:18:55 AM PDT by peyton randolph

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Erik Latranyi

Maybe Lieberman could lead a third party?


21 posted on 05/01/2007 5:42:16 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
and there is little if any enthusiasm for the Republican candidates -- even among Republicans..

Thats bull........there was alot of enthusiasm when Guilliani first got in, but when Thompson signs up, there will be even more!

22 posted on 05/01/2007 5:42:42 AM PDT by Fawn (Achmed the Dead Terrorist--> http://youtube.com/watch?v=2QXQFTEBqNE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Those so called conservative pundits really need to go out and see the real world. It is insulting to our intelligence that this man is allowed to write such extreme stupidity and post it on prominent conservative media outlets.


23 posted on 05/01/2007 5:48:05 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

If the does win the Dem nomination, she will move to the right of the GOP nominee. She’s not stupid. She knows that is the only way she can win. She would already be doing that had it not been for the pesty Obama entering the race.


24 posted on 05/01/2007 5:48:55 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

She has said some of the right things in a Slimes interview and at the SC Bolshecrat debate. But, that does not make me think that she won’t follow the rest of her ilk off the cliff.


25 posted on 05/01/2007 5:49:00 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Bolshecrat, the despicable party of what if and whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

“Call me crazy”

No need, the column demonstrates it clearly.


26 posted on 05/01/2007 5:49:10 AM PDT by Badeye (Yesterday was pretty good, today is shaping up nicely, and tomorrow anything is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

It would be interesting to see some comparisons between 1987 and today in terms of projected primary winners and head-to-head match ups.


27 posted on 05/01/2007 5:50:26 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Happy Easter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KenmcG414

shhhhhhhhh, do not mention facts.


28 posted on 05/01/2007 5:50:30 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

“As each day passes, it becomes increasingly clear that the Democrats will win the White House next year”

Sounds to me like the Left is scared and hoping if they print the lie enough it will become truth.


29 posted on 05/01/2007 5:51:26 AM PDT by Garvin (Obama treats Hillary Clinton and All Republicans as infidels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

If the polls are a true indicator, the GOP will nominate Giuliana.

The idea of POTUS-in-a-ball-gown is unsettling.

Will it be strapless for the inaugural ball?


30 posted on 05/01/2007 5:52:01 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Bruce, they only CALL it a two party system. If the Republican is unacceptable to me I’ll send a protest vote to the Libertarians.


31 posted on 05/01/2007 5:54:26 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PackerBronco

Bartlett is the idiot who claims to be an economist and constantly DUMPS on the FairTax.

What a guy!


32 posted on 05/01/2007 5:57:15 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
If Hillary really wanted to win, she would switch parties.

Of course, that would mean she'd have to abandon her beloved abortion rights, socialist agenda, feminazi viewpoints, and pacifist approach to terrorism.

33 posted on 05/01/2007 6:00:52 AM PDT by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph; BlackElk
This clown is amazingly unsophisticated.

Even if we grant his premise that Hillary is the least leftist of the major Dem candidates, the fact is that her "experience" in the White House combined with her raw lust for power will allow her to hit the ground running in 2009 to perhaps ensure that the election of 2008 will have been the last truly free election this nation has had. Unlike Edwards and Obama, who have only eight years of D.C. experience between them, Mrs. Bill Clinton knows all the chains of command and how everything works. The first thing she'll do is get a fresh batch of FBI files. She won't have to spend time learning the ropes.
34 posted on 05/01/2007 6:04:22 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

This happens every election season.

We have the bi-partisan kooks. (nominate a R/D presidential ticket)

and THIS is a perfect example of the moles who push vote for a democrate to teach the public a lesson.

We see how well this worked out with the left.

Hillaries first task will be to allow homosexuals in the military so she can serve as commander in chief.

This article is nuts.

You could substitute Kerry,Dukakis,Mondale for clinton...


35 posted on 05/01/2007 6:04:49 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Bruce must be GAY! What REAL man would EVER support Hillary!


36 posted on 05/01/2007 6:06:20 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

She’s going to take votes from Rudy.


37 posted on 05/01/2007 6:06:30 AM PDT by conserv8ive1 (Rudy and the Bots...blasting off to oblivion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sittnick
Unlike Edwards and Obama, who have only eight years of D.C. experience between them

Actually, Edwards only has 6 years (1 full Senate term) and Obama has 2 years in his first Senate term. Hillary has 1 full Senate term plus the current year, and 8 years as First Lady.


38 posted on 05/01/2007 6:15:44 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: conserv8ive1

There is truth to this thought process..... because the Republicans are choosing to batter there best candidate.


39 posted on 05/01/2007 6:17:16 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

What’s the difference if it gets down to the Beast and Rudy? They are mirror images of one another. This scenario just isn’t going to happen. I predict a Thompson/Hunter ticket running against a Gore/Obama ticket. Both the Beast and RINORudy are smoking and heading to ground zero.


40 posted on 05/01/2007 6:24:29 AM PDT by mmanager (Pray for the Flux Capacitor - Lib's can go back into time and abort themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson