Posted on 04/30/2007 3:49:41 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4
Al Qaeda is having a bad year so far. While many media pundits like to paint the Islamic terrorists as on a winning streak, it doesn't look that way from the other side. In Iraq, al Qaeda continues to bomb Shia "heretics" and Sunni "apostates". Most of the victims are unarmed Moslem civilians, and this is regularly condemned throughout the Islamic world. Al Qaeda believes that all this carnage will somehow arouse the Sunni Arab world to make war on the Iraqi government, and get the Iraqi Sunni Arabs back in power. As absurd as that sounds, remember that al Qaedas ultimate goal is to establish a religious dictatorship in Iraq, and throughout the Islamic world. World conquest and all that.
The Al Qaeda leadership knows that they are dealing from a position of weakness. So the emphasis is on playing the media, and the impact the media has on the political and military situation. In that respect, al Qaeda takes heart from efforts in the American Congress to force U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq. Again, we have a perception problem here. While al Qaeda would count that as a major victory, the outcome would be disastrous for them. Without U.S. troops to restrain them, Shia militias would be able to go after the remaining Sunni Arab community in Iraq and destroy it. The only ones who support al Qaeda in Iraq is the Sunni Arab community.
Al Qaeda attempts to make its mark in Saudi Arabia continue to fail. The government there recently announced that, over the last six months, they had dismantled a major al Qaeda terrorism effort. Nearly 200 people were arrested, five million dollars, and many weapons and explosives were seized. Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, and many of the terrorist foot soldiers. Some wealthy Saudis, who believe in the conservative Wahhabi brand of Islam that propels al Qaeda, still bankroll the organization. Some are believed to belong to the royal family (there are now over 10,000 al Sauds). There is an ongoing debate in the royal family over how harsh one should be to these pro-terrorist royals. Family relations are a bi deal in Saudi Arabia, one of the few real monarchies left. But the family relationships work both ways. The Saud family stays in power by maintaining good relations with many other prominent families and tribal leaders. This makes it difficult for al Qaeda to operate in secret, because with all those cousins wandering around, it's very difficult to keep a secret.
In Afghanistan, al Qaeda's "Spring Offensive" has been a bust so far. Moreover, across the border in Pakistan, several hundred of al Qaeda men were killed by irate Pushtun tribesmen. Thousands of al Qaeda members fled Afghanistan in late 2001, and settled in with pro-Taliban Pushtun tribes on the Pakistan side of the border. Despite marrying into local tribes, the "foreigners" have made enemies. Some of the "foreigners" took their al Qaeda status too seriously, and demanded additional support from the local tribes. One thing led to another. Not that there's any shortage of Islamic terrorists in Pakistan. The government (mainly the military and intelligence services) tried to play the Islamic extremists in the 1970s, but that backfired. The Islamic extremist groups have become more powerful, and now carry out attacks on government officials. The local terrorists and the al Qaeda foreigners don't always get along, even though they have many of the same goals. Part of the problem is just different customs. For example, a recent video released by the Taliban showed a 12 year old boy beheading a suspected informer. This caused a major backlash in the local media, even in outlets that tend to be pro-Taliban.
In North Africa, a number of recent bombing attacks in Algeria and Morocco backfired on the terrorists. This surprised everyone, but the Arab media was savage in its reaction to these attacks. Naturally, most of the victims were Moslem civilians, and the pundits came down hard on al Qaeda. The attacks did get some good press in the Western media, but that was only because most Western journalists don't check the Arab media reaction to these things.
Egypt has put Hamas operatives under surveillance when they are in Egypt, and limited Hamas access to Egypt. While Hamas is a Sunni Arab terrorist organization, it's growing ties to Iran worries Egypt. While a Sunni Arab country, Egypt was once Shia (centuries ago), and for the Shia Islamic militants, that has some meaning. Lebanese Hezbollah is not a part of al Qaeda either, being bankrolled by Iran and staffed largely by Lebanese Shia. Some Lebanese Sunni and Christian factions have backed al Qaeda, but that has not amounted to much.
In Somalia, what looked like a new al Qaeda refuge, turned into a trap, and many notable al Qaeda operatives were killed or captured. The terrorists got caught in the middle of one of the interminable tribal feuds. In Thailand, growing unrest by Islamic militants has mainly made life miserable for the Moslem minority, in a rural backwater.
In the Balkans, Bosnia has been cracking down on Wahhabi groups that, so far, have been all mouth and no action. But recent arrests have brought in some foreign guests with some seriously bad attitudes. To the east, in Chechnya, the local Islamic militants are pretty much extinct, although many have been spotted in other parts of the world.
Continuing arrests in Europe, and no new attacks. The United States has largely run out of any al Qaeda suspects to even arrest, although the FBI says it has some people under surveillance. No attacks since September 11, 2001, which is causing political problems. Many people, and pundits, are assuming that there is no terrorist threat to the United States. Of course, the FBI can't trot out all the people and organizations they have under investigation, without alerting potential bad guys to their vulnerability. No good deed goes unpunished.
Al Qaeda is still enormously popular among some segments of the Islamic population. Young, unemployed men remain eager al Qaeda supporters, as do educated men frustrated at the sorry state of their government and economy. Saudi Arabia turns out far more college grads with degrees in Islamic Studies, than in things like math, finance or engineering. There aren't enough jobs for all those religion majors, and foreigners have to be imported to do the math, finance and engineering jobs. It's a self inflicted wound that Saudi Arabia, and many other Moslem nations, are trying to address. It's hard, though, as old habits are hard to change in a hurry.
So al Qaeda, lacking any concrete achievements, tries to at least gather more mentions in the media. Google is keeping score for the terrorists, and that may be good for the soul, but it won't take you anywhere else.
Radigan's Raiders InfoWarrior Ping List is kept by MizSterious. Freepmail her to get on our off it.
Be alert. America needs more lerts. We need more IO Auxiliaries, too.
I don’t see what the connection to Google is.
So these murderers are losing everywhere except in the American surrender media and in the Democratic halls of Congress?
Good news as far as it goes, but we still have our own 5th column of traitors in America to deal with.
For later read.
We are losing the propaganda war.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/551cokdv.asp?pg=2
[snip]
An important aspect of this campaign has been waged largely out of the limelight by Coalition and Iraqi Special Forces. Every night, these “operators” stage precision raids based on accurate intelligence that capture or kill Shiite and Sunni extremists at scant cost to themselves. The most valuable targets are “serviced” by a Joint Special Operations Command task force known as OCF-I, commanded by Lieutenant General Stan McChrystal. OCF-I stands for Other Coalition Forces-Iraq, a counterpoint to the common military euphemism for the CIA: OGA, or Other Government Agency. OCF-I is made up of “Tier 1” Special Forces—the best “direct action” specialists from such elite outfits as Delta Force, the Navy SEALs, the Air Force “Night Stalkers,” and the British SAS. It was through their efforts that Abu Musab al Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, was killed last year. (In the current Atlantic Monthly, Mark Bowden offers a revealing—perhaps overly revealing—behind-the-scenes reconstruction of how this operation worked.) Their efforts are complemented by the larger Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force made up primarily of Army Special Forces (Green Berets) working closely with the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) Brigade.
With more than 2,000 soldiers, ISOF has proven itself to be the most tactically skilled and politically reliable unit in the entire Iraqi Security Forces. I got to meet some of its personnel at their heavily guarded compound near Baghdad airport. Many senior officers live on base with their families for fear of being killed if they go back to their old neighborhoods. Indeed, last year a number of ISOF soldiers were kidnapped and killed while off duty. If this has discouraged the remainder, I saw no sign of it.
Thanks for the link
So of course, given their training, the only logical course of action is to go blow somebody up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.