Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards says would consider more taxes on rich [also favored a windfall profits on oil companies]
Reuters ^

Posted on 04/29/2007 1:38:16 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Edwards says would consider more taxes on rich Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:11PM EDT

By Adam Tanner

SAN DIEGO (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards said on Sunday he would consider raising taxes on the wealthy in addition to his earlier proposal to roll back tax cuts ushered in by President George W. Bush.

Earlier this year, Edwards became the first Democratic candidate to embrace taxes hikes to fund an ambitious health- care plan he estimates would cost from $90 billion to $120 billion a year. Under that plan, he would eliminate tax cuts Bush implemented for those making more than $200,000 a year.

The former one-term senator from North Carolina told reporters at the California Democrats' annual convention he would also consider additional taxes on the rich beyond that.

"I think it is worthy of consideration," he told a news conference. "We have gone from a record surplus to a record deficit and I think there are some judgments the next president will have to make."

Presidential candidates typically avoid speaking about tax increases in fear of alienating U.S. voters. In 1984, former Vice President Walter Mondale suffered a landslide defeat to Republican President Ronald Reagan partly attributed to Mondale's admission he would raise taxes.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, also a Democratic candidate for president, quickly distanced himself from any such rise in taxes.

"Democrats, whenever he have a solution, we want to tax," Richardson told a news conference. "I'm different. I'm a tax cutter. I believe you use the tax code to reward entities that do well, that do right, that create jobs."

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
unelectable....
1 posted on 04/29/2007 1:38:17 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
unelectable... but pretty.
2 posted on 04/29/2007 1:40:37 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
unelectable... but pretty.

He's so pretty
Oh, so pretty,
And we can now take his 28,000 sq ft new home!

3 posted on 04/29/2007 1:44:42 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

From what I understand, Edwards is getting a lot of moolah from the hidden Soros foundations. If that is so, you can count on him to tow the moonbat line.


4 posted on 04/29/2007 1:49:12 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He was also the first to drop out of the Fox debates, which was a big deal on the whacko left websites.

He’s in the pocket of Soros and the moonbat left.


5 posted on 04/29/2007 1:50:46 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Cool. Nobody rich give him any money.


6 posted on 04/29/2007 1:55:47 PM PDT by keats5 (tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What an economic idiot (as all liberal democrats are). Got to love the class envy shtick....look where is has got US so far.


7 posted on 04/29/2007 1:59:30 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

To 59 million Americans, John Edwards and his policies are quite electable.


8 posted on 04/29/2007 2:00:05 PM PDT by Dahoser (Never question Mr. Nibbles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

Just another Soros lap dog. Edwards, I mean, not you.

Yeah, Edwards is running to the left, he’d better be happy the world is not flat.


9 posted on 04/29/2007 2:01:09 PM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I think there should be a 100% tax on fruity spa treatments for men.


10 posted on 04/29/2007 2:01:26 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

More taxes.Now there’s a unique D’crap political idea huh ???


11 posted on 04/29/2007 2:02:31 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
12 posted on 04/29/2007 2:03:34 PM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Apparently when he said all Americans should sacrifice he only meant 1% of us, the rest of us ..... IT’S PARTY TIME ON THE RICH MANS DIME!!!!
13 posted on 04/29/2007 2:04:54 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

John Edwards: No “Global War on Terror”


14 posted on 04/29/2007 2:05:16 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
How ‘bout a windfall profits tax on government? They are the big winners when the demand for oil is at its highest in history. It’s not the big oil companies that make more when the price goes up, their costs stay about the same. It’s government that doesn’t do a single thing to find, drill, transport, refine and sell oil products. They simply stand at the end of the line and collect their take regardless of who how high or how low gas prices are. Gas prices are high because demand and consumption is high, as high as it’s ever been. And it’s going higher. Government at all levels gets the same take whether gas is a dollar a gallon or ten dollars a gallon. It’s time they give us back some of what they take that they haven’t earned. At least the oil companies have to work for the part of the take, government just takes and takes and takes, but never gives.
15 posted on 04/29/2007 2:13:27 PM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obie Wan

More taxes.Now there’s a unique D’crap political idea huh ???


Yes, very unique idea — in fact if we go back and look at the ENTIRE KERRY PLATFORM in the last election, it boiled down to one line of speech.

** I AM GOING TO RAISE YOUR TAXES **

And that is all that traitorous moron ever said, his entire platorm and agenda for America.


16 posted on 04/29/2007 2:15:01 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m sure that raising taxes on the big oil companies is very popular. It’s pure economic ignorance. The “big” American companies like Exxon/Mobil are being shoved aside and dwarfed by the really big players like the Saudis and the Russians. Let’s see how these idiots like it if the U.S. loses control of its oil supplies even further.


17 posted on 04/29/2007 2:15:13 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Playing the Mondale card. Maybe some day somebody will make it work, but who on earth thinks the Gov’t doesn’t get more than enough tax money already?


18 posted on 04/29/2007 2:16:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Yeah and the scariest part is if it wasn’t for Ohio,HE WOULD HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT !!!


19 posted on 04/29/2007 2:17:09 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

A socialist candidate wants to raise taxes. Shocking, just shocking.


20 posted on 04/29/2007 2:18:19 PM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson