[wagglebee]

The pro-abortionists are livid at such a display of realism. They typically call the practice ‘intimidation’ or ‘emotional blackmail’.

The culture of death doesn't want ANYTHING to interfere with infanticide.

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping

[Clintonfatigued]

They need to replace the word “emotional” with “realistic.”

Pro-lifers should be in a good mood. They are slowly winning the public over. There is reason to believe that Roe vs. Wade will be overturned in our lifetimes.

[goldstategop]

Of course not. The entire idea of abortion rights - like the rest of liberalism itself, is premised on the lie. Liberals are destroyed by first contact with the truth.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[RichInOC]

“Man, it is really hot in here...Mom! [fweet!] Yo, Mom! You’re not wolfin’ down jalapeños again, are ya?. Yeah, ‘cause let me tell you about my friend, Ned. His momma ate nothin’ but spicy foods?...Homeboy came out red, Ma. Bright red. So if you keep crammin’ those peppers down your neck, I might just bust out of here early...grab something on the way out, take it with me.”

[The Worthless Miracle]

Since when have the libs been against emotions? That’s all they understand.

[AmericaUnited]

Question... How can a women be ‘emotional blackmail’ed over seeing a "blob of nothing" jiggle around? If it's "nothing", i.e. just a blob of cells, then what is the problem?

Of course we all know what a blatant lie that is and deep down inside these abortion gouls know this is a life.

[Always Right]

I guess they are just pro-uninformed Choice.

[G Larry]

Truth and reality are great enemies of Satan and the liberals.

[HighWheeler]

[LiteKeeper]

It is an issue of control, money, and votes...even if it is wrapped in a lie!

[Disambiguator]

Hideously, South Carolina could be the first state to make the viewing mandatory, making women view another life in their bodies before they kill it.

The only hideous thing is the actual killing, which is admitted to in this statement. It should say "another's life" to reflect the true nature of the act.

[Maelstorm]

I’m glad they finally are doing this. I’ve been advocating this for the longest time. They say they want women to have a choice, let them know the choice they make. The way to fight the left is offer a reasonable option that no reasonable person could disagree with and let them position themselves against it.

[Bob J]

I’m confused, are they making them mandatory?

[Last Dakotan]

Maybe in retaliation the Pro-abortionists can come up with a device that will allow you to preview your child’s behavior when he is a teenager.

[GladesGuru]

“The pro-abortionists are livid at such a display of realism. They typically call the practice ‘intimidation’ or ‘emotional blackmail’.”

The pro-abortionists lie. What they really are hopping mad about is the loss of a crucial “talking point”.

Those in the “business” call the rpactice “profit reduction”.

Follow the money trail.

[jveritas]

They want to kill the innocent unborn with their hearts, minds, eyes, and ears closed.

[Mojave]

Ultrasound would be fine with them if it could be used to kill infants.

[Fred]

A solid commonsense approach. A reliable option for women. This legislation will do wonders for adoption.

What a great gift to give both the potential parents and the child, ADOPTION..

[teletech]

Of couse liberals don’t want a woman to view the life she is about to take. Liberals are like La Cucaracha, they scurry away when the lights come on.

[Quick or Dead]

I’m guessing that the “choice” for an ultrasound and viewing all of a baby’s fingers and toes, their nose, their lips, isn’t included in the “pro-choice” movement.