Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shame on the Liberals for their Afghan policy
http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Worthington_Peter/2007/04/26/pf-4130709.html ^

Posted on 04/28/2007 10:19:33 AM PDT by exg

Shame on the Liberals for their Afghan policy By PETER WORTHINGTON

Regardless of what they say for public consumption, the federal Liberals really do not like the military, especially the soldiers.

This is apparent in their efforts to mortify the Harper government over claims of torture and abuse of Taliban prisoners captured by the Canadians in Kandahar and turned over to the Afghans.

There's even the suggestion that our soldiers could be nailed for war crimes if abuses are committed against these prisoners by Afghans -- a concern echoed by Liberal allies in the private sector.

The ludicrous alternative is that Canada set up prison camps in Afghanistan to ensure Geneva Convention treatment of prisoners. This is so foolish as to be nonsensical, but the Liberals feel there's political mileage by flogging this theme.

The Liberals demand that Harper withdraw the army from Afghanistan by 2009 was defeated in a Commons vote (150-134) when the NDP sided with the Tories.

(The NDP wants us out of Afghanistan now, not in 2009, presumably so our troops can go to Darfur -- a worse mess).

This is the same Liberal party that, in its fading days as the government, switched the army from a constabulary role in Kabul to a fighting role in Kandahar -- and now snipes at Harper for supporting the policy. (Since the Trudeau days, Liberals have subverted our military.)

As for Taliban prisoners being abused by Afghan captors, that depends on one's definition of abuse, harassment, intimidation, torture. Remember, this is Afghanistan and Canada is there to support the elected Afghan government and to help train its national army.

Afghanistan is not our country. In their daily life, Afghans treat one another roughly. Yet we're bound by Geneva rules, which in itself is crazy and archaic.

Prisoners unanimously say they are treated decently by Canadian soldiers before being turned over to the Afghan authorities. That's what should concern us.

In fact, Canada should -- as should the U.S. and Britain -- opt out of Geneva Convention agreements regarding treatment of prisoners. By definition, our troops should not, and generally do not, torture.

Geneva conventions are a two-way street and apply only to enemies that abide by certain rules -- wear a distinctive uniform, have an identifiable chain of command, carry weapons openly, treat prisoners humanely. That sort of thing. Alien concepts to the Taliban and al-Qaida.

The Geneva Convention was significant when we were at war with Germany and Italy, but has no application against future enemies we are likely to go to war against -- like international terrorists.

It's a given that we treat prisoners humanely, so there's no need for the Geneva Convention against enemies that violate its terms.

By all means, encourage our Afghan "allies" to practice basic decency to prisoners, but don't interfere to the point where we are running their country, their army or their justice system.

Alternatively, if there's real concern about how prisoners we capture are treated, stop taking prisoners. Simply shoot them instead of accepting surrender. Would that please government critics?

Our troops have more support among the Afghan people than many at home realize. This has made our field missions more successful. We are beating the Taliban in the field, hence their reliance on roadside bombs. This is hard on our troops, exacerbated by the reality that Canadians are not unified in backing them.

And that's the Liberals ploy to make political mileage. It makes the soldiers' already tough job more difficult, but, traditionally, the Liberals don't give a damn for the army. They want power and political points. They have little in the way of shame.


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; genevaconvention; genevaconventions
I agree with Peter on this one.
1 posted on 04/28/2007 10:19:34 AM PDT by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive; GMMAC; fanfan

ping


2 posted on 04/28/2007 10:20:07 AM PDT by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exg; fanfan; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

3 posted on 04/28/2007 10:30:34 AM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exg

Good article — it’s refreshing when those on the right show good confidence in their ideas.


4 posted on 04/28/2007 10:41:29 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exg; blam; Cincinatus' Wife; sarcasm; happygrl; Byron_the_Aussie; robnoel; GeronL; ZOOKER; ...
Worthingtom was an infantry officer in Korea.
5 posted on 04/28/2007 11:18:45 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exg

The Liberals in Canada sound just like the Democrats in the USA.


6 posted on 04/28/2007 12:15:11 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Precisely !


7 posted on 04/28/2007 2:00:32 PM PDT by exg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Bump


8 posted on 04/28/2007 8:32:04 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson