Replies

Here’s the email I just sent out far and wide:

Al-Qaeda Iraqi group thanks Reid ! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1824519/posts

This is from my friend Gloria last evening: “Just got off the phone -—very polite—told him I was “saddened”—by Senator Nelson’s vote today— Also said I left New York 20 yrs ago to escape Senator Schumer—was disgusted that he’s in control of EVERYTHING!——Now -—they are listening very carefully and also asked for my Zip Code—— Please pass this “far and wide”——anyone and everyone!! For those living in Florida, Senator Nelson’s Orlando Phone: #888-671-4091

For those not living in florida, you may contact your own Democrat congressman (if you have one) at the toll-free link below. The Democrats cannot turn back - they and their cheer-leaders in the drive-by media (98+% of whom are admitted Democrats) are heavily invested in defeat. They cannot allow America to win the war in Iraq or they lose in up-coming elections.

Those voting “Yea”, were in effect voting not to fund the troops because they knew Bush would veto the bill with the “conditions” they attached to it, ie: they attached their pet pork projects to the bill along with a date certain to bring the troops home. The whole thing was nothing but a dog-and-pony-show waste of time because they know in advance that they don’t have enough votes to overturn the President’s veto.

Senate votes to require Iraq withdrawals
AP ^ | April 26, 2007 | ANNE FLAHERTY
Posted on 04/26/2007 1:26:19 PM EDT by 50mm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1824047/posts?page=53#53

WASHINGTON - A defiant Democratic-controlled Senate passed legislation Thursday that would require the start of troop withdrawals from Iraq by Oct. 1, propelling Congress toward a historic veto showdown with President Bush on the war.

The 51-46 vote was largely along party lines, and like House passage of the same bill a day earlier, fell far short of the two-thirds margin needed to overturn the president’s threatened veto. Neverthe less, the legislation is the first binding challenge on the war that Democrats have managed to send to Bush since they reclaimed control of both houses of Congress in January.

[snip]

Any American who let’s them get away with this without making every effort to stop them, has my everlasting contempt.

Watch Video here: Joe Lieberman BLASTS Democrat’s Surrender Bill!! (Video) http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/04/joe-lieberman-blasts-democrats.html

David Broder: “...consider the mental gyrations performed by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., as he rationalized the recent comment from his majority leader, Harry Reid, the leading light of Searchlight, Nev., that the war in Iraq “is lost.”

On “Fox News Sunday,” Schumer offered this clarification of Reid’s off-the-cuff comment. “What Harry Reid is saying is this war is lost — in other words, a war where we mainly spend our time policing a civil war between Shiites and Sunnis. We are not going to solve that problem... . The war is not lost. And Harry Reid believes this — we Democrats believe it... . So the bottom line is if the war continues on this path, if we continue to try to police and settle a civil war that’s been going on for hundreds of years in Iraq, we can’t win. But on the other hand, if we change the mission and have that mission focus on the more narrow goal of counterterrorism, we sure can win.”

Everyone got that clear? This war is lost. But the war can be won. Not since Bill Clinton famously pondered the meaning of the word “is” has a Democratic leader so confused things as Reid managed to do with his inept discussion of the alternatives in Iraq. ... Reid’s verbal wanderings on the war in Iraq are consequential — not just for his party and the Senate but for the more important question of what happens to U.S. policy in that violent country and to the men and women whose lives are at stake. - Washington Post 4/26/2007

Call to Action: Call the White House to Support President Bush on Iraq War Funding Bill
Thursday, April 26, 2007 | Kristinn
Posted on 04/26/2007 1:18:25 PM EDT by kristinn
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1824040/posts

The Al Qaedacrats have voted to surrender in Iraq. The only thing preventing a victory by their terrorist allies is President Bush and his veto pen.

Please contact the White House immediately to express support for victory in Iraq by our troops and to support President Bush’s promise to veto the Al Qaedacrats’ surrender bill.

Now more than ever, our troops need you and President Bush needs to hear from you.

White House comment line: 202 456-1111 Open from 9AM to 5PM.

Please forward this message to everyone you know who supports victory in Iraq.

The email for the White House is Comments@WhiteHouse.gov.
The President’s e-mail address is: President@whitehouse.gov

*
I was on hold for 25 seconds and told the lady we support the president and General Petreus and that the President should veto this anti Iraq funding bill! wow..that took total under 1 1/2 mins...best call I ever made! - 42 by Recovering Ex-hippie

While your phone is hot:

Toll free number to U.S. Capitol switchboard - they will transfer you to Harry Reid, or any other House and Senate member’s office: 1-866-220-0044.

The other number for the switchboard is 202-225-3121 - (not toll free)

HARRY REID direct: 202-224-3542 Call. I called yesterday and could only get machine. I also emailed and essentially said same...IF we’ve lost the war, WHO WON? Said Mr. Reid owes it to the American people to publicly answer this question. Also, emailed VP Cheney to thank him for his response to Reid’s comments about losing the war. Told him he expressed exactly what many Americans believe. 79 & 83 by 4integrity

*
Global Incident map - updates every 300 seconds: http://www.globalincidentmap.com/home.php

*
How your Senator voted:

Grouped By Vote Position YEAs -51
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Smith (R-OR)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs -46
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

Not Voting - 3
Graham (R-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
McCain (R-AZ)

53 posted on 04/26/2007 1:58:03 PM EDT by GeorgiaDawg32
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1824047/posts?page=53#53

bttt