Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The University of Alberta Discovery (new inexpensive cancer treatment)
University of Alberta website ^ | March 15, 2007 | Dr. Enagelos Michelakis

Posted on 04/23/2007 11:21:56 AM PDT by Rennes Templar

March 15, 2007 The University of Alberta

DCA is an odourless, colourless, inexpensive, relatively non-toxic, small molecule. And researchers at the University of Alberta believe it may soon be used as an effective treatment for many forms of cancer.

Dr. Evangelos Michelakis, a professor at the U of A Department of Medicine, has shown that dichloroacetate (DCA) causes regression in several cancers, including lung, breast, and brain tumors.

Michelakis and his colleagues, including post-doctoral fellow Dr. Sebastian Bonnet, have published the results of their research in the journal Cancer Cell.

Scientists and doctors have used DCA for decades to treat children with inborn errors of metabolism due to mitochondrial diseases. Mitochondria, the energy producing units in cells, have been connected with cancer since the 1930s, when researchers first noticed that these organelles dysfunction when cancer is present.

Until recently, researchers believed that cancer-affected mitochondria are permanently damaged and that this damage is the result, not the cause, of the cancer. But Michelakis, a cardiologist, questioned this belief and began testing DCA, which activates a critical mitochondrial enzyme, as a way to "revive" cancer-affected mitochondria.

The results astounded him.

Michelakis and his colleagues found that DCA normalized the mitochondrial function in many cancers, showing that their function was actively suppressed by the cancer but was not permanently damaged by it.

More importantly, they found that the normalization of mitochondrial function resulted in a significant decrease in tumor growth both in test tubes and in animal models. Also, they noted that DCA, unlike most currently used chemotherapies, did not have any effects on normal, non-cancerous tissues.

"I think DCA can be selective for cancer because it attacks a fundamental process in cancer development that is unique to cancer cells," Michelakis said. "One of the really exciting things about this compound is that it might be able to treat many different forms of cancer”.

Another encouraging thing about DCA is that, being so small, it is easily absorbed in the body, and, after oral intake, it can reach areas in the body that other drugs cannot, making it possible to treat brain cancers, for example.

Also, because DCA has been used in both healthy people and sick patients with mitochondrial diseases, researchers already know that it is a relatively non-toxic molecule that can be immediately tested patients with cancer.

”The results are intriguing because they point to the critical role that mitochondria play: they impart a unique trait to cancer cells that can be exploited for cancer therapy” Dario Alteri Director University of Massachusetts Cancer Center

Investing in Research

The DCA compound is not patented and not owned by any pharmaceutical company, and, therefore, would likely be an inexpensive drug to administer, says Michelakis, the Canada Research Chair in Pulmonary Hypertension and Director of the Pulmonary Hypertension Program with Capital Health, one of Canada’s largest health authorities.

However, as DCA is not patented, Michelakis is concerned that it may be difficult to find funding from private investors to test DCA in clinical trials. He is grateful for the support he has already received from publicly funded agencies, such as the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR), and he is hopeful such support will continue and allow him to conduct clinical trials of DCA on cancer patients.

Michelakis’ research is currently funded by the CIHR, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Canada Research Chairs program, and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

"This preliminary research is encouraging and offers hope to thousands of Canadians and all others around the world who are afflicted by cancer, as it accelerates our understanding of and action around targeted cancer treatments," said Dr. Philip Branton, Scientific Director of the CIHR Institute of Cancer.

DCA and Cancer Patients

The University of Alberta’s DCA Research Team is set to launch clinical trials on humans in the spring of 2007 pending government approval. Knowing that thousands of cancer patients die weekly while waiting for a cure, Dr. Michelakis and his team are working at accelerated speed, condensing research that usually takes years into months. Fundraisers at the University of Alberta are determined to raise the money to allow this next phase of research to begin. Once Health Canada grants formal approval, the University of Alberta’s Research Team will begin testing DCA on patients living with cancer. Results with regards to the safety and efficacy of treatment should be known late this year.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2007 11:21:57 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Is that what Paul Harvey was talking about this morning, when he said the treatment should be available in three years?


2 posted on 04/23/2007 11:24:09 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Interesting. Bump for later read to hubby.


3 posted on 04/23/2007 11:25:14 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Excellent. Fantastic news.


4 posted on 04/23/2007 11:27:33 AM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

OOps. That won’t get much air time here. Too many pharmaceutical companies and doctors with too much to lose.


5 posted on 04/23/2007 11:29:17 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Apparently the DCA cannot be patented, and so they are having trouble coming up with funding for the clinical trials.


6 posted on 04/23/2007 11:29:59 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Don’t know but it sure sounds promising. I would think the key factor in testing will be any toxic effects. Of course conventional therapies are so toxic now. But chlorine compounds are generally not tolerated well by the body.


7 posted on 04/23/2007 11:31:19 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

God Speed, Dr. Evangelos Michelakis! Please!...........


8 posted on 04/23/2007 11:31:22 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Exactly. But if it works it will be hard to stop even by entrenched medicine.


9 posted on 04/23/2007 11:33:11 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar


10 posted on 04/23/2007 11:34:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
Canada ping.

Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.

11 posted on 04/23/2007 11:35:19 AM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
But chlorine compounds are generally not tolerated well by the body.

Table salt seems not so bad as long as the quantities involved aren't extreme...
12 posted on 04/23/2007 11:35:29 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetate


13 posted on 04/23/2007 11:35:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
Table salt seems not so bad as long as the quantities involved aren't extreme...

....or HIGH VELOCITY.............

14 posted on 04/23/2007 11:36:30 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

This is absolute bullshit! The Canadian Cancer Society is not a drug company! It has many millions of dollars as well as other related charities. They can afford to fund the clinical trials.


15 posted on 04/23/2007 11:43:27 AM PDT by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That myth has been busted.

http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot33.htm


16 posted on 04/23/2007 11:44:05 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
....or HIGH VELOCITY.............

But without excessive amounts of high velocity, it's just not as fun, don't you know...
17 posted on 04/23/2007 11:47:16 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BillM

I did not pull that statement out of my ear. If you would bother to do a search, you would find several writers who know about this situation, not me. No need to be vulgar and disrespectful, Bill.


18 posted on 04/23/2007 11:50:17 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Please save the moonbattery for DU. Certainly the drug companies won’t finance trials as there is no return. They will not, however, try to block it. There are plenty of other health issues to for them to research and make money from creating treatments.

There are plenty of cancer research non profits out there to foot the bill. That’s why these groups were created - right?


19 posted on 04/23/2007 11:51:17 AM PDT by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BillM

Dear Bill, when you have calmed down and recovered yourself, read:

http://scienceblogs.com/terrasig/2007/04/perversion_of_good_science.php

http://www.ganderbeacon.ca/index.cfm?iid=2443&sid=20630

Also, see Canadian quilters raise money for cancer treatment..

http://www.thepost.ca/webapp/sitepages/content.asp?contentid=493879&catname=Local%20News&classif=News%20Live


20 posted on 04/23/2007 11:55:36 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson