Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-War Liberals in House Weary of Opposing Iraq Funding Bill
Fox News ^ | April 20, 2007 | Unknown

Posted on 04/20/2007 11:40:41 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

Anti-war liberals worried about party unity are reluctant to mount opposition to war spending legislation in the House even if it does not set a firm date for troop withdrawal. Their support would pave the way for Democratic leaders next week to send President Bush a bill that would fund the Iraq war and still call for troops to leave by March 31, 2008, albeit a nonbinding withdrawal date.

The measure would be weaker than House Democrats wanted but is advocated by the Senate, where Democrats hold a slimmer majority and many party members oppose setting a firm timetable on the war.

Rather than let the bill sink, "we want to get it to the president and let him veto it," said Rep. Diane Watson, D-Calif., a party liberal who opposes funding the war at all...

Bush has promised to veto any bill that sets a timetable on the Iraq war, contending that decisions on troop deployments must be left to the commander in chief and military commanders on the ground. His position raises the bigger question of what Democrats will do after the veto.

The quiet support of a House-Senate compromise among the rank-and-file represents a new tack by Democrats who say they want to pull together in their fight against Bush on the war...

Last month, Watson was one of several liberal Democrats who threatened to block passage of the House bill because she did not think the measure went far enough to end the war. Watson and California Democratic Reps. Lynn Woolsey, Barbara Lee and Maxine Waters said they refused to fund the war and wanted language that would end combat before the end of 2007...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congess; iraq
Watson thinks the measure to defund the war doesn't go far enough!!
1 posted on 04/20/2007 11:40:45 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
a nonbinding withdrawal date

Binding, nonbinding -- it doesn't matter, we have sent a clear message to our enemies worldwide that we don't have the nerve to defend ourselves.

2 posted on 04/20/2007 11:47:31 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
we have sent a clear message to our enemies worldwide that we don't have the nerve to defend ourselves......

...at least for anything that lasts more than 3 years.

3 posted on 04/20/2007 11:56:18 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Pass legislation in the House and Senate declaring a defeat first then at least they can pretend to be intellectually honest.
4 posted on 04/20/2007 12:20:39 PM PDT by tobyhill (only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Boy, these letfy sissies won’t stand and fight for anything...


5 posted on 04/20/2007 2:36:37 PM PDT by Stand W (Fetchez La Vache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson