Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More than 150 players plan to wear No. 42
ESPN ^ | April 12, 2007 | espn.com

Posted on 04/12/2007 7:15:02 PM PDT by TravisBickle

Are the growing numbers of players planning to wear Jackie Robinson's No. 42 on Sunday too much of a good thing? Minnesota Twins outfielder Torii Hunter thinks so.

"This is supposed to be an honor," Hunter told USA Today, "and just a handful of guys wearing the number. Now you've got entire teams doing it. I think we're killing the meaning.

"It should be special wearing Jackie's number, not just because it looks cool," Hunter told the newspaper.

"It kind of waters it down," Cleveland Indians pitcher C.C. Sabathia told USA Today. "I could see the Dodgers since that was his team, but not everyone else."

What started as Reds outfielder Ken Griffey Jr. receiving special permission from Robinson's widow Rachel to honor the 60th anniversary of Robinson integrating the major leagues has balooned into more than 150 players saying they'll don Robinson's No. 42 on Sunday. Five entire teams -- the Los Angeles Dodgers, Pittsburgh Pirates, St. Louis Cardinals, Philadelphia Phillies and Houston Astros -- will field rosters of 42s for the day.

"I didn't know so many guys planned to wear the number. I sure wasn't expecting whole teams to wear it," Griffey told the newspaper of his gesture-turned-movement. "But I'm not going to look at it as a negative. This is a tribute for what the man has done, a day to celebrate."

But Los Angeles Angels left fielder Garret Anderson told the newspaper he won't wear No. 42. "I just don't feel I'm worthy of it," he explained.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baseball; civilrights; jackierobinson
I guess I'm confused by Hunter's comments. Wouldn't the honor be greater if more people observe it?
1 posted on 04/12/2007 7:15:04 PM PDT by TravisBickle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle
Mike Wilbon asked Hunter on ESPN's PTI today if he thought only "African American" MLB players should wear the number. Hunter awkwardly dodged the question, but it was apparent that's precisely what he thought.
2 posted on 04/12/2007 7:18:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

This is really just a silly charade, in my opinion. Black (American) ballplayers now represent less than 10% of the players on big league rosters, so the elimination of the color barrier is losing its importance over time anyway.


3 posted on 04/12/2007 7:18:55 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle
Maybe they should just all wear a #42 Patch on their shouders for the entire season.
4 posted on 04/12/2007 7:19:21 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

This sounds like the black leaders complaining that Black History Month is taking away from the importance people place on black achievement.

You just can’t make some people happy.


5 posted on 04/12/2007 7:20:25 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle
Los Angeles Angels left fielder Garret Anderson told the newspaper he won't wear No. 42. "I just don't feel I'm worthy of it," he explained.

Garret Anderson GETS IT...if it were only Ken Griffey Jr, or even only the Dodgers, it would be one thing. But the 150 bandwagon guys who are wearing it (just to say they did it) are diluting the significance.

6 posted on 04/12/2007 7:25:39 PM PDT by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

Didn’t the Dodgers retire #42?


7 posted on 04/12/2007 7:33:05 PM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

Just another example of the players being much much smarter than the bozos paid the big bucks to run the game. The NBA had a synthetic ball and a All Star game in Sin City and we know how those bright ideas worked out. That All Star game cross pollinated and ended up getting NFL guys suspended.


8 posted on 04/12/2007 7:34:23 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

They should also be giving credit to Branch Rickey.


9 posted on 04/12/2007 7:37:06 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

Whay is Robinson so important? What about the other 41?


10 posted on 04/12/2007 7:39:27 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle
FYI: Jackie was a Republican too.
11 posted on 04/12/2007 7:42:02 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative; TheRedSoxWinThePennant; SE Mom; raccoonradio; bikepacker67; ...

Baseball ping...


12 posted on 04/12/2007 8:03:29 PM PDT by nutmeg (The Democrats' "new direction" for Iraq: SURRENDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

All of major league baseball retired #42 a few years ago, even though Jackie Robinson didn’t play for those teams.
(The idea offended my sensibilities.) He didn’t play for those teams.

They can’t have it both ways — either the number is retired or it isn’t.

It really offends my sensibilities if more than one player on a team is allowed to wear #42 at one time.


13 posted on 04/12/2007 8:25:45 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Question: How long before the first #42 jersey, autographed by the player who wore it for one day, appears on E-Bay?


14 posted on 04/13/2007 5:29:27 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill; nutmeg

Jackie Robinson was a Republican?? Thanks for the info, did’nt know that.. You never hear that in the MSM!!


15 posted on 04/15/2007 1:54:15 PM PDT by Dutchy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson