I already told you in the prior post.
Tell us again how you came up with FDT’s cancer being the least responsive to aggressive treatment.
I’m waiting.
Like I said, I read a lot.
You seem to think I was placing a particular limit on his viability while I was only stating averages from one site; by aggressive treatment I meant a course of chemo and radio drugs while you seem to think I meant the disease couldn’t be treated.
This Univ of Maryland site has a general overview that you might want to read.
http://www.umm.edu/patiented/articles/how_serious_non-hodgkins_lymphomas_000084_5.htm