[ChicagoConservative27]

This will be the last draw if that POS go’s to Iran.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Did I hear correctly? Refusing to meet with Bush. Says she is not going to waste her time. What tha...?

[sono]

It's a pity the taxpayers can't cut off funding for Congress.

[Republican Red]

Interesting point over at HotAir about Nancy's upcoming trip to Iran

Another good point by Bob Owens, which ties back oddly enough into the Fox/Democrat debate standoff. Like I said, they just define enemy differently:

When Democrat Presidential candidates Clinton, Obama and Edwards dropped out of the Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate that was going to be co-sponsored by Fox News, many liberals crowed over the decision. It is their contention that Fox News is an “illegitimate” news source (or a “propaganda machine,” or not even a news outlet at all. Someone should tell Nielsen), and that if these candidates had answered the questions provided by the CBCI in a televised debate on Fox News, it would “legitimize” the network…

Apparently, the double standard is this: Liberals are solidly behind the idea of boycotting a news network to avoid giving them legitimacy, but they are in favor of defying their own government’s foreign policy to lend legitimacy to yet another terrorist state that has sponsored attacks on our allies and are actively engaged in trying to kill U.S. soldiers.