Skip to comments.
Eisenhower-Era Planes Still Defending U.S.
Newsmax ^
| April 3, 2007
| Dave Eberhart
Posted on 04/03/2007 3:24:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Congress seems to corrupt nearly everything it touches...
To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; ...
PING!
My 900th thread posted and counting...
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The heroic Duricy was a victim of what military experts call the "weapon systems procurement holidays of the 1990s" when the U.S. government took advantage of the end of the Cold War, called it a "peace dividend" and didn't appropriate the necessary funds to modernize its aging fleet of military planes.A/K/A as the Clinton Reign of Error ...
3
posted on
04/03/2007 3:28:03 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: ikka
experts call the "weapon systems procurement holidays of the 1990s"
Guess we could also call it the Prelude to 9/11.
4
posted on
04/03/2007 3:30:15 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The heroic Duricy was a victim of what military experts call the "weapon systems procurement holidays of the 1990s" when the U.S. government took advantage of the end of the Cold War, called it a "peace dividend" and didn't appropriate the necessary funds to modernize its aging fleet of military planes. AKA "the Clinton Legacy."
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Interesting reading. Too bad it is too much for the average “JOE” to understand and take the time to read.
Short and sweet BITS is all that can be read.
Even to me it becomes another overwhelming situation. What can one person do? Sit and worry?
6
posted on
04/03/2007 3:37:27 PM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Eisenhower-Era Planes Still Defending U.S.Yeah, that's what happens when leftist appeasement-oriented surrender monkeys keep cutting the defense budget. Apparently, they didn't get the memo - it takes a strong offense to create a strong defense.
Their efforts to undercut the War in Iraq is Part II of their strategery. Part I was to allow the US military weapons systems to age and become decrepit. Part II is to focus on trying to force our military to capitulate a war they haven't lost . . . . . . . . YET!!!
7
posted on
04/03/2007 3:38:42 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
OMG the M-2 .50 cal is nearly 90 years old !!!
8
posted on
04/03/2007 3:41:41 PM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(Pelosi Democrats agree with Al Queda more often than they agree with President Bush.)
To: Eagle Eye
OMG the M-2 .50 cal is nearly 90 years old !!! Yes, but it doesn't have to take off and land.
9
posted on
04/03/2007 3:43:51 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(Now selling carbon offsets. Get some today!)
To: DustyMoment
they didn't get the memo
I sure got it on 9/11 when I was wondering where all the attack craft were and why they had not left the alert sites. I didn't know just how few alert sites and attack craft were left.
10
posted on
04/03/2007 3:47:42 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The B-52 is still the workhorse of the bomber fleet. The B-1 is a beautiful airplane, looks like it is flying 600 MPH while on the ground. BUT, it was designed to drop nukes.. Has a limited capacity in a non-nuke war. The B-2 is ugly (IMHO), stealthly and slow, but has the range if not the lifting capacity of the Buff.
C-130... I had the privelidge of being in a C-130 the day the J model was type certified, and am here to tell you that it is a beautiful cargo plane. So the design is 30 years old, they are still coming off the assembly line. Not all missions need a C-5 capacity.
KC-135, works well for almost all of the fleet.
Bottom line, (IMHO) Why do we need to reinvent the wheel. Buy more of the same design and call the fleet upgraded. Why go thru the R&D cycle, and perhaps get an inferior product (whitness the Osprey fiasco).
.....Bob
11
posted on
04/03/2007 3:49:00 PM PDT
by
Lokibob
(Some people are like slinkys. Useless, but if you throw them down the stairs, you smile.)
To: SIDENET
And the Abrams M-1 is 1960’s technology. It flies, or seems to.
But those C-130’s are remarkable aircraft as are the B-52’s. Much more manuverable than one might think.
OIF is definately putting a strain on everything.
12
posted on
04/03/2007 3:49:15 PM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(Pelosi Democrats agree with Al Queda more often than they agree with President Bush.)
The other side of the coin is that for Buffs to be flying at 45 years old would indicate a good design and very capable maintenance personnel.
13
posted on
04/03/2007 3:53:08 PM PDT
by
2111USMC
To: Lokibob
Why do we need to reinvent the wheel.
This article sounds more like it is saying the planes are just old, not that the designs are old.
14
posted on
04/03/2007 3:53:16 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: P-40
Solution to aging military aircraft problem:
Pass law saying that average age of all aircraft used by any politician must be same as that of military aircraft.
15
posted on
04/03/2007 3:56:12 PM PDT
by
OldArmy52
(China & India: Doing jobs Americans don't want to do (manuf., engineering, accounting, etc))
To: ikka
Everything associated with the Clintons turns to, well...you know.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
We could purchase some block 60 F-16s now and some new F-15s.
However, what we really need in another 100 Billion in the Defense Budget.
17
posted on
04/03/2007 4:12:21 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Lets build more B-52’s.!!!!!!....
18
posted on
04/03/2007 4:16:58 PM PDT
by
GitmoSailor
(Cold War Vet==Is it Bush's fault Yet??...Please help this Fourum Now!..Before its to late!!!...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
19
posted on
04/03/2007 4:24:50 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: zot
“I’m flying my grandfather’s airplane” said the young pilot!
20
posted on
04/03/2007 4:29:03 PM PDT
by
GreyFriar
( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson