I've been following this case a great deal and have come to a conclusion.
The prosecutor was asked to find out if a crime was committed in regards to her "outing:".
The only way there was a crime is if she was protected under the 1982 Intelligence Identity Protection Act.
When she was asked this last week she fumbled and stumbled and finally said that nobody had yet said she was covered.
Are they trying to make us believe that after three years they haven't determined that yet?
Hardly believable. They just keep using words like classified or covert. NEVER has anybody from the CIA or Fitzpatrick said she was covered. This investigation was over before it started but the media and Fitz have been able to keep it going for three years.
When will somebody shout this from the rooftops? She was not covered therefore there is no underlying crime.
This is so frustrating; thanks for the additional info.