Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/25/2007 1:35:34 PM PDT by RKV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RKV

Put that on the front page:

"Government gets money from people who have money"

Wouldn't it be nice if the Government had to seek money by getting each or our permissions, invidually. Like political parties used to, before they, to went to the Government trough.


2 posted on 03/25/2007 1:44:00 PM PDT by donmeaker (The speed of light is 186,234 miles per second. Not just a good idea, its the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

So it could be said with some certainty that the slackers in America make out thanks to Uncle Sugar!


3 posted on 03/25/2007 1:44:13 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

"Overall, we find that America's lowest-earning one-fifth of households received roughly $8.21 in government spending for each dollar of taxes paid in 2004."

But the lowest-earning one-fifth has no net worth.

Therefore, the logical conclusion is that they don't hang on to the money for long.

In fact, in many cases the money is paid directly to middle or upper class professionals such as doctors and teachers, who provide services to the bottom fifth.


4 posted on 03/25/2007 1:46:26 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

"From each according to their means, to each according to their needs." - Karl Marx


6 posted on 03/25/2007 1:58:58 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

now the big question .... what is the breakdown of those quintiles as far as individual and family incomes?


10 posted on 03/25/2007 2:07:02 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aflaak

ping


15 posted on 03/25/2007 2:15:57 PM PDT by r-q-tek86 (Snakes can't be taught to walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

Sounds like the thing to do is to find a few tens of million really low earners who are in the country illegally, and make them citizens, so that they can soak up more trillions we got lying around.


17 posted on 03/25/2007 2:22:17 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

"Understanding Tax Cuts"
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D

Professor of Economics
University of Georgia

Sometimes politicians, journalists and the liberal left exclaim;
"It's just a tax cut for the rich!" and it is just
accepted to be fact.

But what does that really mean?

Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, I hope the
following will help. Please read it carefully.

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner and the bill for
all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite
happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm
going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20." Dinner for
the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so
the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free.
But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could
they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair
share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the
sixth man would each end up being paid to eat their meal.

So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce
each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and! he proceeded to
work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four
continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men
began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only
saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he
get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison.
"We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine
sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money
between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how
our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the
most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them
for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.

In fact, they might start eating overseas where
the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D
Professor of Economics
University of Georgia


22 posted on 03/25/2007 3:04:11 PM PDT by B4Ranch ("Steer clear of entangling alliances with any portion of the foreign world." -George Washington-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV
we find that America's lowest-earning one-fifth of households received roughly $8.21 in government spending for each dollar of taxes paid in 2004

If only my investment portfolio could produce such returns
29 posted on 03/25/2007 5:01:27 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RKV

So 40% of us are carrying the other 60% huh... Funny that. NOT!


34 posted on 03/26/2007 5:59:39 AM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole; discostu; webstersII; Publius Valerius

Overall, we find that America's lowest-earning one-fifth of households received roughly $8.21 in government spending for each dollar of taxes paid in 2004. Households with middle-incomes received $1.30 per tax dollar, and America's highest-earning households received $0.41.

Is this enough socialism to prevent the socialist revolution you claim you fear?

52 posted on 03/27/2007 5:01:13 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson