Replies

If the video were ad hominem argument, I would agree. It would play right into hillary clinton's only known effective pose: that of victim. That is why, in fact, the original mashup, 'Vote Different,' failed to sway Dems, at least according to Zogby. See my last post, which is on this very point:

Big Brother is watching you, but are you watching Big Brother? (HILLARY-IMAGE FLAW IN AD MASHUP)

The purpose of this video, OTOH, is to expose the clinton menace, to alert and inform women with the facts of clinton abuse of women, abuse of power, and willful terrorism failure.

I am targeting women because hillary clinton is targeting women.

hillary clinton trying to pass herself off as a feminist icon is a travesty.

Mia T,

I think you are one of the most talented participants in the logosphere that I have seen over many years.

I have seen your work from the days the Clintons were still in office. There is no doubt you made many people aware of the absolute danger posed by the Clintons and I believe you did it in nonpartisan manner.

For every hit piece that is thrown against these grifters, there are an equal number of hit pieces against GWB and other prominent Republicans. For example GWB is a cocaine using alcoholic with brain damage, GWB conspired to bring down the WTC, GWB is Hitler. We conservatives think of such persons that put out this garbage as the 'fringe lunatic left'. They think of people that put out hit pieces on the Clintons as 'right-wing extremists'.

A different psychology needs to be used to attract the all-important swing voter.

I know personal characteristics of HRC that drive the ***male*** gender to a fit of disgust; the nervous cackle, the slow monotone delivery, the simpleton proposals with no practical backup, the women vs. men angle, the woe-is-me-I'm-a-victim repose to almost everything, the idiot antics such as putting on a yankee cap and saying I have always been a yankee fan, the constant condescension, the shallow superficial facade masking evil intentions, the dangerous emotions and Machiavellian undertones, the lack of integrity and trustworthiness.

I don't know of any traits that uniquely rankle the ***female*** gender because I have no experience to draw from. I am not sure even if HRC's unattractive thighs are a negative because obesity is such a problem in this country that who knows how many women in this country would look at her thighs and think 'ah, she's just like most of us'.

I really believe Clinton is going to have her issues crafted for her. I think a good portion of the election will rest on people voting against her personal qualities or staying home because they would never vote Republican otherwise and they are embarassed, ashamed or disgusted to think of voting for this menace. Personal traits will be key to swing votes, not issues (because issues will be crafted to overcome their objections).

Now how would you think to write a script that would bring out personal traits that women abhor about HRC but at the same time do not attack her personally? How will the tables be turned so that it is HRC ***herself*** who evokes an image of ridiculous? Would it be sarcasm? What would provoke her to anger?

Example:

How about a reverse psychology skit where shrill and scorned women with big thighs and scowling expressions, and also other women with blank looks that would epitomize vacuity, and others still that are negatively viewed for a variety of reasons; how about this group of women get together in some sort of women-only meeting with a Mao-size poster of HRC behind them, and we hear these women gab about the need for a 'Strong Woman'. The skit ends with a caption to 'Support Women in a Fascist Male Dominant World - Vote Hillary'.