Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Geological Carbon Sequestration Being Planned?
Wisconsin Public Utility Institute ^

Posted on 03/21/2007 12:17:10 PM PDT by BamaCharm

2007 Power Lunch Series

Geological Carbon Sequestration

What will we do with CO2? When, at What Cost and Where?

May 1, 2007 Tong Auditorium, Engineering Centers Building, UW-Madison

WPUI is pleased to present the "Geological Carbon Sequestration" Power Lunch seminar with the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin and the UW Energy Institute.

Program Summary The Wisconsin Public Utility Institute will host a seminar to explore a variety of carbon sequestration issues, including whether Wisconsin is capable of capturing carbon and storing it in geologic formations, if and when this might be an option, and what environmental risks geological carbon sequestration may create.

Program Background In preparing for greenhouse gas limitations, institutions around the country are researching and piloting ways to capture and store carbon. Geological carbon sequestration is potentially both a short and long-term storage option, aimed at reducing the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Researchers are currently focusing their efforts on devising storage methods. Some of the options currently being considered are to use it for enhanced oil or coal bed methane recovery production, and for injection into saline formations.

In a “Power Lunch” format, this seminar will:

• Explore carbon sequestration • Review storage technology options • Discuss carbon sequestration regional initiatives, the Department of Energy's research program, and public-private partnerships that focus on carbon sequestration • Review of Wisconsin 's geological options in terms of potential feasibility for carbon sequestration in the state • Include an open panel discussion on policy frameworks that make these types of advances possible, and regulatory and legal issues that remain barriers to deployment.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carbon; co2; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I brought this approach up last week in a thread here about global warming. Today, I received an invitation by email to attend a conference on geological carbon sequestration. Hold on to your pocketbook. If this comes to fruition, the implementation and operational costs will be passed on to utility ratepayers. The anti-capitalists, however, will not be pleased. They want to ride the global warming bandwagon in order to reduce industrial output. Secondly, the CO2 can be liquified, and injected into oil reservoirs where it acts as a solvent for extraction of the nearly two-thirds of petroleum reserves trapped in the underlying rock formations. Domestic oil supplies could increase substantially. Greenies will hate that.
1 posted on 03/21/2007 12:17:13 PM PDT by BamaCharm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
geological carbon sequestration

What's any of this got to do with horses?

/just kidding

2 posted on 03/21/2007 12:20:55 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (The anti-libertarian Neo-Ciceronian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Power Lunch seminar

Am I required to wear my Power tie?

3 posted on 03/21/2007 12:22:44 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

The liquified CO2 could be sold to oil companies to aid in the extraction of more oil? Oh, the irony!


4 posted on 03/21/2007 12:24:01 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

I still think the whole idea is incredibly stupid.


5 posted on 03/21/2007 12:24:52 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

Why can't it be "sequestered" in stuff like carbon fibers, diamonds and such.........


6 posted on 03/21/2007 12:24:59 PM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

Sell it to coca-Cola and Pepsi... How DO they make their carbonated beverages anywhose?

lets see, at 5mg per burp times 6 burps per cola times 3 colas per day time 365 times 100 million people... I cam guessing that coke and Pepsi are TOTALLY responsible for global warming dure to carbon diaxide emissions.

Thats 3,285,000 Kg per year. I am TOTALLY making this up!!!

Maybe they can 'buy' carbon credits (I'll sell them some)


7 posted on 03/21/2007 12:25:27 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
The anti-capitalists, however, will not be pleased. They want to ride the global warming bandwagon in order to reduce industrial output.

Um, let's see. No problem-o.

Any sequestration undertaken by private industry runs the risk of taking too much CO2 out of the atmosphere, tipping the balance toward letting too much heat escape with the consequent climatic risks that implies. (Hey! It's easy to be green, no matter what Kermit says!)

We'll need to form some think tanks, conduct studies and start writing our grant proposals for the funding this important issue demands.

There's a reason Chicken Little runs around in circles. They aren't tied into warming per se, that's the panic de jour. Any panic will do.

8 posted on 03/21/2007 12:32:56 PM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

I propose that get as much cO@ out of the atmosphere as humanly possible and pump it all down into the bottom of the ocean; since that's where most of it is coming from, in the first place. Diffusing it into the sea at deep water locations would show the greenies that we understand their need feel good while accomplishing next to nothing. Yeah, it'd be an economic treadmill, but it's the least damaging solution I can think of. Excess would, of course, be available to the oil industry for the aforementioned purpose.


9 posted on 03/21/2007 12:57:19 PM PDT by HKMk23 (Total domination over all kingdoms under heaven will be given to the saints of YHVH. -- Daniel 7:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

besides the extra cost 30%+ is this scheme scaleable/longterm ????

If they start suggesting storage in ocean depths, watch out for a potential ecological disaster that dwarfs anything seen so far....
10 posted on 03/21/2007 1:12:01 PM PDT by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf

ping


11 posted on 03/21/2007 1:22:59 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

This is incredibly stupid.

The Earth already does this, on a scale that beggars the imagination. The oceans contain almost 100 times as much carbon as the atmosphere. Much of this carbon gets trapped in carbon rich compounds which sink to the bottom.

Over long periods of time, huge amounts of carbon accumulate on ocean floors, all over the world. These carbon deposits eventually get pushed beneath continental plates, through plate tectonics. The ocean floor rock (with its huge carbon load) eventually gets all the way down to the mantle, where it melts, and stays trapped below the Earth's crust, for a very long time.


12 posted on 03/21/2007 1:37:09 PM PDT by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

Can anyone explain to me just what the heck is "carbon sequestration"?


13 posted on 03/21/2007 3:46:54 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm

This scam will cost every American family an additional $2,000 annually, according to economists at the Wharton School.

Oh, and 2 to 3 million jobs will be destroyed.


14 posted on 03/21/2007 4:10:33 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Ice-cubes melting in the sun is an act of God. Get over it, Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Carbon sequestration is removing carbon in the form of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Trees do this. The ocean does it. Industrial plants that produce compressed gases do it.

My faviorite form of carbon sequestration involves putting it in solution in tightly sealed containers in my basement, with an occasional test release to make sure everything is working properly.

I figure I can store several cases of sequestered carbon. Where do I get my carbon credits to buy more cases?


15 posted on 03/21/2007 4:45:46 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
what the heck is "carbon sequestration"?

It's what we used to call a "Dump" or landfill where trees, leaves, lawn clippings, and so on were buried preventing them from breaking down and returning to the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide.

We are now required by the environmentally enlightened to pay to have these materials sent to a composting facility where bacteria converts them back into Carbon dioxide and Methane.

Go Figure

16 posted on 03/21/2007 6:39:07 PM PDT by joshhiggins (O you who believe! do not take the MUSLIMS for friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
"Geological Carbon Sequestration"

Isn't that just a fancy name for "coal mine"?

17 posted on 03/21/2007 6:43:58 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

You can have my club soda when you pry it from my..............


18 posted on 03/21/2007 6:45:45 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (A day in the country is better than a week in town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
It's the same thing that happened here. The Global Warming witch doctors don't really want to do anything outside the box to lower CO2 emissions or cool the earth.

They have one agenda, and one agenda only, and it doesn't have anything to do with climate.

19 posted on 03/21/2007 6:50:24 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshhiggins; NicknamedBob

Now I understand. Thanks for the info.


20 posted on 03/21/2007 6:56:18 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson