Skip to comments.
White House Offers Testimony of Miers and Rove Behind Closed Doors
MSNBC ^
| 3/20/2007
| n/a
Posted on 03/20/2007 12:01:30 PM PDT by Pyro7480
MSNBC reporting the above. Senate Schumer responds, and says "he isn't happy" with the proposal.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chucky; manficinetbastard; miers; rollovertime; rove; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Democrats want an open hearing and on-record, no doubt to get their faces out there.
1
posted on
03/20/2007 12:01:32 PM PDT
by
Pyro7480
To: Pyro7480
A bloody bone for the wolves. It will just make them hungrier.
2
posted on
03/20/2007 12:04:31 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Pyro7480
Excellent strategy. The question to Democrats: Do you want answers or do you just want sound bites and media clips?
Thought so.
3
posted on
03/20/2007 12:04:55 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMajority
(Dems denounce Foley, but do they denounce NAMBLA?)
To: Pyro7480
What good is a "Show Trial" without the klieg lights and the codepinkos in attendance?
4
posted on
03/20/2007 12:06:17 PM PDT
by
AU72
To: Pyro7480
WH did a smart thing. Dems want a show trial. Dems are 'not happy' with the proposal. And when Dems insist on a public hearing, WH can say it is a political witch hunt with no basis, etc.
Of course, WH has to call Dems on their BS first...do they have the guts?
5
posted on
03/20/2007 12:06:37 PM PDT
by
MaestroLC
("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Fourth Century)
To: Pyro7480
The old saying here in DC is this: "The most dangerous place in town is the ground between a TV camera and Chuck Schumer."
The same used to be said of Connie Chung. My word, if you got in her shot somehow, you heard about it!
Nice to know she's started a new career as torch singer!
6
posted on
03/20/2007 12:07:49 PM PDT
by
RexBeach
("Broad-minded is just another way of saying a fellow is too lazy to form an opinion." Will Rogers)
To: MaestroLC
WH did a smart thing. Dems want a show trial. Dems are 'not happy' with the proposal. And when Dems insist on a public hearing, WH can say it is a political witch hunt with no basis, etc. Of course, WH has to call Dems on their BS first...do they have the guts? Agreed but they should have fought harder first. By rolling over so easily and so early, it just looks like appeasement.
7
posted on
03/20/2007 12:09:11 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: rhombus
It will just make them hungrier.And get leaked anyway.
8
posted on
03/20/2007 12:12:02 PM PDT
by
GATOR NAVY
(QMC(SW) Ret.)
To: Pyro7480
Why is Bush complying with these Nazi's?
What kind of legal counsel is he getting?
Bush doesn't owe the dems any of this.
Courage man! Find your courage!
9
posted on
03/20/2007 12:15:55 PM PDT
by
Jo Nuvark
(Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
To: Pyro7480
Man this is a stupid move.
Either have them testify in the open, or not at all. Half measures will only fuel more speculation.
10
posted on
03/20/2007 12:16:48 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Pyro7480
Senate Schumer responds, and says "he isn't happy" with the proposal. I don't know why not since the testimony would happen behind closed doors and democrats would promptly twist the testimony as they paraphrase to the drive-by media to say whatever dems want it to say and pubbies cannot publicly correct the assertions. When will the administration wise up?
11
posted on
03/20/2007 12:17:46 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: Pyro7480
Bush Administration is becoming the biggest political milque-toast in my memory. I expect them to roll over and assume the position once again. I hope I'm wrong, but they don't have the fight. They're dead.
12
posted on
03/20/2007 12:19:20 PM PDT
by
RightResponse
(It depends on what the defamation of Islam is .....)
To: Pyro7480
When the Clintons wanted their own people in the White House Travel Office, they had no problem with accusing Billy Dale of criminal behavior so that they could put in their own people. President Bush has every right to remove any U.S Attorney he pleases. He should have accused them of fraud or embezzlement or rape or something, like the Clintons did to poor
Billy Dale.
13
posted on
03/20/2007 12:20:01 PM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: Pyro7480
Why not do it publicly if there is nothing to hide?
I doubt it could be seriously considered "national security".
14
posted on
03/20/2007 12:20:45 PM PDT
by
newcats
(Natural Born Skeptic)
To: RightResponse
Fox breaking news....President Bush to address the controversy at 6. Fire Gonzales?
15
posted on
03/20/2007 12:20:50 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
('scuse me??)
To: Pyro7480
FNC Alert
President to make a comment about the Attory General at 5:45 pm EST
16
posted on
03/20/2007 12:21:25 PM PDT
by
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
To: Pyro7480
Somewhere the line has to be drawn on just what the Senate can do and cannot. I would return all subpoena back to the Senate and inform them that they will not be honor.
17
posted on
03/20/2007 12:24:11 PM PDT
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: Jrabbit
"Fox breaking news....President Bush to address the controversy at 6. Fire Gonzales?All he has to do, is get some Reagan like balls. Give it a, "there they go again.." and explain that Clintoon fired the entire roster of attournies general, and tell Schumer that if he wants to have hearings, overturn the constitution, and eliminate the separation of powers.
18
posted on
03/20/2007 12:26:04 PM PDT
by
RightResponse
(It depends on what the defamation of Islam is .....)
To: Pyro7480
If only America was as smart as us Californians, we would not have any controversy. What we did, we saw how the crime rate increased 50% in Oakland after Jerry Brown became mayor, and said, now there is a man qualified for AG, and promptly elected him.
19
posted on
03/20/2007 12:30:50 PM PDT
by
HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
(All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
To: Pyro7480
"Senate Schumer responds"
Chuckie, after the movie of the same name.
20
posted on
03/20/2007 12:34:20 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Hillary - the Empty Pants Suit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson