To: burzum
I would like to see any executive who supported paying the protection money end up in a dirty Colombian prison. Would it have been much better for those executives to have been murdered?
3 posted on
03/17/2007 9:25:50 PM PDT by
mc6809e
To: mc6809e
Would it have been much better for those executives to have been murdered? The executives bribed terrorist organizations! Consider if we had another US business bribing Al Qaeda so that they could do business in Pakistan or Afghanistan. Would you still use the excuse that it is OK since the executives had to pay the money to be able to do business and not be murdered?
The correct response for those executives in this case is to report the contacts to the federal government and reduce their business interests in an country that can't enforce its laws.
4 posted on
03/17/2007 9:30:44 PM PDT by
burzum
(Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
To: mc6809e
Would it have been much better for those executives to have been murdered?
They the executives were never in danger, they paid to protect thier workers.
5 posted on
03/18/2007 12:34:37 AM PDT by
snodog
To: mc6809e
Would it have been much better for those executives to have been murdered?
They the executives were never in danger, they paid to protect thier workers.
6 posted on
03/18/2007 12:34:48 AM PDT by
snodog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson