Clinton...BBBBBWWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!
As big a laugh as that is.....CARTER!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!
ROTFLOL.
Well, you've gotta know that when Bill Clinton is described as great because he is less polarizing than Reagan, it sends up a red flag. These historians are all a bunch of acedemia socialists, IMHO.
Since when is "polarizing" a factor of greatness? Winston Churchill was polarizing before and during WWII; Neville Chamberlain was supposedly not polarizing, and he sold out the Czechs through appeasement. These so-called historians haven't got a clue to what the definition of greatness is.
What a Joke