Yep. I've heard Vallely talk about that. Though it is odd that no one seems to be able to put them in a green room together before all this happened. Vallely says Wilson outed his wife in Spring '02. Trouble is, no one can find a TV appearance by Wilson in that time frame, much less one concurrent with Vallely.
But that probably wouldn't matter to someone who simply believes whatever a lawyer says. Wells said they are five, so there must be five -whether five people ever make such a claim or not - right?
I've heard Vallely talk about that. Though it is odd that no one seems to be able to put them in a green room together before all this happened.
Define "before all this happened". Contrary to your claim,
Wilson and Vallely were on the same Fox show on September 9, 2002. Even if that's not in the Spring 2002, it is well before Wilson's op-ed hit piece and "all this happened".
But that probably wouldn't matter to someone who simply believes whatever a lawyer says. Wells said they are five, so there must be five -whether five people ever make such a claim or not - right?
Point me to a statement where Joe Wilson specifically denied that he's told others that his wife worked with the CIA. Every time I've seen that this issue has come up, he has changed the subject, claiming the trial was not about him. Until then, there is no reason to believe that Wells was lying when he made a statement in open court. You're essentially accusing an officer of the court of acting in bad faith and lying to a judge without any evidence that he did so. And perhaps the witnesses weren't "proffered" because
Fitzgerald objected to these witnesses being called , and the judge was sympathetic to those claims.