Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pan_Yans Wife

He also said he would overturn McCain-Feingold. He has no authority as President to overturn any law especially one that the SCOTUS has already ruled. Talk about pandering -- he leads the pack. Any conservative that swallows his line, enjoys being pandered to and doesn't understand Government 101 IMHO.


8 posted on 03/02/2007 9:29:13 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Broken Glass Republican -- RudyforPresident2008@yahoogroups.com or http://www.rudygforamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom

Would he fight for its repeal though? That's an important issue to consider.

Ronald Reagan is not going to walk through the door and rescue the party. There isn't a perfect candidate in terms of positions or electibility so it looks like the party will have to settle on the best of the bunch and decide who can keep the dems out of power. There is no excuse for allowing Hillary in the WH. Gripe about Romney's RINO positions if you will but if you have the ability to stop Clinton III then to not do so is wrong.

If he's the guy come November 08 then we could do worse...


10 posted on 03/02/2007 9:35:54 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom

I was under the impression that as president he could just sign a law that repealed an old law. I was under the impression that the scotus decision just said that mccain feingold was okay as it, not ala roe v wade, "this is the law of the land" sort of thing.


53 posted on 03/03/2007 11:06:52 AM PST by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson