Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computer Sleuths Try To Crack Pioneer Anomaly
New Scientist ^ | 3-2-2007 | Stuart Clark

Posted on 03/02/2007 4:30:53 PM PST by blam

Computer sleuths try to crack Pioneer anomaly

19:24 02 March 2007
NewScientist.com news service
Stuart Clark

Because the tracking system for the Pioneer probes changed so much since their launches in the early 1970s, researchers have to look at each data file individually to put them in the same format (Image: NASA/ARC)

Scientists and engineers remain on course in their efforts to determine what caused the twin Pioneer spacecraft to apparently drift off course by hundreds of thousands of kilometres during their three-decade missions. Within a year, they expect to be able to decide whether this drift was caused by a fault on the spacecraft.

Launched 35 years ago on Friday, Pioneer 10 was the first spacecraft to reach the outer Solar System and return pictures of Jupiter. It was followed by Pioneer 11, which launched on 5 April 1973 and also visited Saturn.

After these historic encounters, NASA kept track of the drifting spacecraft, finally losing contact with Pioneer 11 in 1995 and Pioneer 10 in 2003.

The so-called Pioneer anomaly showed up in the tracking data as a tiny deceleration for both spacecraft, even though they were heading in different directions. It was as if the Sun’s gravity was pulling a little harder than Newton’s laws predicted (see 13 things that do not make sense).

Escaping heat

The source of the deceleration has long been suspected to be heat escaping from the small nuclear generators onboard, known as RTGs (Radioisotope Thermal Generators). Previous analyses that claimed to rule out this effect have been contested.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anomaly; pioneer; sleuths; space

1 posted on 03/02/2007 4:30:56 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

2 posted on 03/02/2007 4:31:56 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Anyone think about the simple answer... they've both been picking up mass in the form of dust and particles for 30 years... variations in the particle density on the way through the solar system could easily have caused the drift.


3 posted on 03/02/2007 4:37:45 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Tech support keeps telling them, "Please for to be reobooting your computer, sir..."


4 posted on 03/02/2007 4:37:55 PM PST by SquirrelKing ("When a coin in the carbon pot rings, out of global warmin hell a soul does spring." - Timothy Ball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Hi Alamo Girl:

Would an adjustment to the fine structure constant account for a slight increase in gravitational pull?


5 posted on 03/02/2007 4:38:22 PM PST by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Easy...Bush's Fault!


6 posted on 03/02/2007 4:40:17 PM PST by Redleg Duke (Heaven is home...I am just TDY here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

I was going to say that the solar wind over time could blow them off course. I suppose that after time your gravity or electrical charge would pick up debris. Wonder if they accounted for either.


7 posted on 03/02/2007 4:41:10 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
"Please for to be reobooting...

You're a Great American.

8 posted on 03/02/2007 4:41:32 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


9 posted on 03/02/2007 4:42:52 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
heat escaping from the small nuclear generators onboard, known as RTGs (Radioisotope Thermal Generators)

Oh great,
now were polluting outer space. Where's Gore!

10 posted on 03/02/2007 4:44:38 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

thats--just--disturbing....


11 posted on 03/02/2007 4:45:41 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
they've both been picking up mass in the form of dust and particles for 30 years...

At the speed those thingas are going, wouldn't the dust just blow off?

12 posted on 03/02/2007 4:53:26 PM PST by Lancey Howard (Yes, it's a joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
hey've both been picking up mass in the form of dust and particles for 30 years... variations in the particle density on the way through the solar system could easily have caused the drift.

Friction/resistance=de-acceleration. Space isn't totaly empty! Almost, but not quite.

13 posted on 03/02/2007 4:54:54 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (Compromise with Islam means you will submit to them killing you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

microgravity would allow substantial amounts of material to accumulate under the right conditions.


14 posted on 03/02/2007 4:55:02 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

Very interesting.


15 posted on 03/02/2007 5:01:22 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
microgravity would allow substantial amounts of material to accumulate under the right conditions.

That would explain my need to buy larger pants sizes every few years...

16 posted on 03/02/2007 5:01:54 PM PST by COBOL2Java ("No stronger retrograde force exists in the world" - Winston Churchill on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
Re: ...see 13 things that do not make sense...

Okay, make that 14!

Just where does your lap goes when you stand up?

Beats the hell out'a me where it goes...
17 posted on 03/02/2007 5:28:33 PM PST by Bender2 (A True Democracy Dream is two bears and Ted Kennedy voting on what to have for lunch...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

.....global warming..?


18 posted on 03/02/2007 5:33:54 PM PST by spokeshave ("Hitlery is uniting the country. Everybody hates her.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
A bump at the Heliosphere boundary layer 'shock wave' interface? The anomaly might prove the presence of the bow wave posited as the heliopause...


Or not.
19 posted on 03/02/2007 5:35:05 PM PST by ASOC ("Once humans are exposed to excellence, mere average desirability is disappointing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

In a word - no.


20 posted on 03/02/2007 5:45:44 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

However, that is not the case here. This pops up off and on about every two years here. :-)


21 posted on 03/02/2007 5:46:38 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

This was noted long before that.


22 posted on 03/02/2007 5:47:29 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

that was easy ;-)


23 posted on 03/02/2007 5:50:09 PM PST by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
OK.. explain why it's "not true here", when the accretion of mass on any object, along with positive and negative impacts of that mass on the object in it's trajectory, effects every other object in the universe to one extent or another.
24 posted on 03/02/2007 5:51:02 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

It's natural for the spacecraft to slow down. It's been a long green flag run, the tires are worn down, the track is cooling & they're getting a little loose off the corners. Time to pit for new rubber.


25 posted on 03/02/2007 5:52:41 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

The world does revolve around you.


26 posted on 03/02/2007 5:57:23 PM PST by bmwcyle (It is time to stop the left at the wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

ah, but those variables were a known quantity, and part of the programed trajectory.


27 posted on 03/02/2007 5:58:08 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Re: My asking where does your lap go when you stand up?

spoke's answer: .....global warming..?

That's only...
when standing... in her presence!

Well, for me that is...
28 posted on 03/02/2007 6:02:10 PM PST by Bender2 (Kate bakes my sail any day, any week...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam

My uncle worked on a portion of the power system for the Pioneer probe.


29 posted on 03/02/2007 6:05:24 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Life isn't fair. It's just fairer than death, that's all.--William Goldman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
Kate, the new frontier, definitely looking very pioneer probable.

Who needs space? The heavenly body has descended.

Nice Pic.

30 posted on 03/02/2007 6:28:29 PM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

We would see torques on the vehicle itself if the dust was thick enough to cause a delta-V. Also the instruments would have detected said dust.


31 posted on 03/02/2007 7:47:40 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
microgravity would allow substantial amounts of material to accumulate under the right conditions.

Not with the mass of the probes nor the short time involved.

32 posted on 03/02/2007 7:49:02 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

At these masses and velocities, the fine structure constant is just that. A constant.


33 posted on 03/02/2007 7:50:05 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

Cool. I was in the Voyager control room during the Neptune flyby.


34 posted on 03/02/2007 7:51:07 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

I taped the PBS special on Neptune at Night and would actually watch it when I came home after work. What was it, 20 minutes between new pictures being shown?

My kids used to bring friends over just to laugh at their crazy old man.

What a difference in generations.


35 posted on 03/02/2007 8:27:15 PM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
RA, is not this same effect being observed by the Voyager spacecraft?

Speaking of which, as of now, (04:47 UTC 3/3/2007),  Voyager 1 is 102.03 AU from Earth, and 102.00 AU from the sun.

Voyager 2 is 82.619 AU from Earth and 82.112  AU from the sun.

36 posted on 03/02/2007 8:50:17 PM PST by zeugma (MS Vista has detected your mouse has moved, Cancel or Allow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
more Voyager trivia courtesy of Celestia, the universe simulator... (Free for Linux, Mac and Windoze)

Click HERE for what the solar system would look like from VGER1 if you could see the orbits of the planets from there...

To give an idea of how far Voyager 1 has travelled, consider that Pluto is currently 31.356 AU from Earth, and 31.273 AU from the Sun.  

 

37 posted on 03/02/2007 9:04:58 PM PST by zeugma (MS Vista has detected your mouse has moved, Cancel or Allow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: blam
I thought this would be about how they stuffed a whole house full of furniture Twelve kids and a set of silver in a covered wagon.
38 posted on 03/02/2007 9:08:18 PM PST by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Wow! How cool. :-) Glad you enjoyed!!!! Whoohoo

We used to watch the pictures being built pixel by pixel as the data streamed in and was decoded.


39 posted on 03/02/2007 9:08:32 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Indeed it is. I have the original papers on this. I need to dig them out.


40 posted on 03/02/2007 9:09:24 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; RadioAstronomer
that was easy ;-)

LOLOL! It certainly was. Thanks, RadioAstronomer!
41 posted on 03/02/2007 10:05:59 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Guess I'm not quite as stupid as your terse answers would indicate..

Possible explanations:

Explanations for the discrepancy that have been considered include:

observational errors, including measurement and computational errors, in deriving the acceleration

Approximation/statistical errors

a real deceleration not accounted for in the current model, such as:

gravitational forces from unidentified sources such as the Kuiper belt or dark matter

drag from the interplanetary medium, including dust, solar wind and cosmic rays

gas leaks, including helium produced by radioactive decay escaping from the spacecrafts' radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs)

radiation pressure of sunlight, the spacecraft's radio transmissions, or thermal radiation pressure from the RTGs (See Radioisotope rocket)

electromagnetic forces due to an electric charge on the spacecraft

new physics

clock acceleration (gr-qc/0410084) between coordinate or Ephemeris time and International Atomic Time.

A modification of the law of gravity. The theory known as MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics), states that the force of gravity deviates to a very different force law at very low accelerations of order: 10−10 m/s2from the traditional Newtonian value.

42 posted on 03/03/2007 5:52:23 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

I was not calling you stupid. I did not have heaps of time to write a dissertation here. I have discussed this at length with some of the principal investigators and was relaying quick answers.

My apologies


43 posted on 03/03/2007 8:04:23 AM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

That I can accept. Thanks.


44 posted on 03/03/2007 9:33:36 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson