Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

The answer is in my statements like these:

I've already stated that FR will probably become even more conservative than it already is, through attrition if nothing else. Besides continuing to champion the defense of America, FR just might become the "Conservative Conscience of the Republican Party," ie, we may become a real thorn in the side of moderate/liberal Republicanism. Someone has to try defend the party from completely tossing out traditional American conservatism. Might as well be us.


How many times must I say FR is a conservative site? We do not support abortionism, homosexualism, feminisim, environmentalism, gun control, liberalism, socialism, etc, etc, etc. When I say I suspect we will become even more conservative than we already are, possibly via attrition if nothing else, what do you think I'm referring to? When FR starts pushing hard and I mean hard against abortion, gay marriage, homosexual education forced on our school children, pandering to illegal aliens, gun control, McCaine-Feingold type usurpation, global warming, etc, etc, even if supported or advanced by the GOP, then I fully suspect certain types of moderate/liberal Republican supporters are probably going to be a little uncomfortable here. We will be fighting for traditional American conservatism no matter who we have to fight against and I'm afraid that's going to piss off some folks.


And I'll borrow a slogan used by the NFRA that I realy like:

"We are the 'Republican' Wing of the Republcan Party!"


1,123 posted on 03/02/2007 2:45:30 PM PST by Jim Robinson (It's "originalists" not "constructionists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

Gitty Up!


1,149 posted on 03/02/2007 3:01:42 PM PST by commonguymd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
When I say I suspect we will become even more conservative than we already are, possibly via attrition if nothing else, what do you think I'm referring to?

I think you may of got your answer.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1794037/posts?page=1183#1183

1,211 posted on 03/02/2007 4:44:06 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
DAMNED STRAIGHT BUMP!!!

Thanks for reinforcing FR's mission statement and boosting my morale, Jim!

1,214 posted on 03/02/2007 4:52:34 PM PST by TomServo ("Jim Henson’s Flying Leatherneck Babies!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Excellent post Jim! I'm with you all they way on this and fully agree with what you've said. Keep up the great work and know that you are appreciated for standing firm for what many of us believe in.


1,228 posted on 03/02/2007 5:51:02 PM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

"The answer is in my statements like these:

I've already stated that FR will probably become even more conservative than it already is, through attrition if nothing else. Besides continuing to champion the defense of America, FR just might become the "Conservative Conscience of the Republican Party," ie, we may become a real thorn in the side of moderate/liberal Republicanism. Someone has to try defend the party from completely tossing out traditional American conservatism. Might as well be us.


How many times must I say FR is a conservative site? We do not support abortionism, homosexualism, feminisim, environmentalism, gun control, liberalism, socialism, etc, etc, etc. When I say I suspect we will become even more conservative than we already are, possibly via attrition if nothing else, what do you think I'm referring to? When FR starts pushing hard and I mean hard against abortion, gay marriage, homosexual education forced on our school children, pandering to illegal aliens, gun control, McCaine-Feingold type usurpation, global warming, etc, etc, even if supported or advanced by the GOP, then I fully suspect certain types of moderate/liberal Republican supporters are probably going to be a little uncomfortable here. We will be fighting for traditional American conservatism no matter who we have to fight against and I'm afraid that's going to piss off some folks.


And I'll borrow a slogan used by the NFRA that I realy like:

"We are the 'Republican' Wing of the Republican Party!""


And that is why FR is yours. Thank you Mr. Robinson!!


1,245 posted on 03/02/2007 6:57:08 PM PST by samiam1972 (http://imrunningforpresident.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

"The answer is in my statements like these:

I've already stated that FR will probably become even more conservative than it already is, through attrition if nothing else. Besides continuing to champion the defense of America, FR just might become the "Conservative Conscience of the Republican Party," ie, we may become a real thorn in the side of moderate/liberal Republicanism. Someone has to try defend the party from completely tossing out traditional American conservatism. Might as well be us.


How many times must I say FR is a conservative site? We do not support abortionism, homosexualism, feminisim, environmentalism, gun control, liberalism, socialism, etc, etc, etc. When I say I suspect we will become even more conservative than we already are, possibly via attrition if nothing else, what do you think I'm referring to? When FR starts pushing hard and I mean hard against abortion, gay marriage, homosexual education forced on our school children, pandering to illegal aliens, gun control, McCaine-Feingold type usurpation, global warming, etc, etc, even if supported or advanced by the GOP, then I fully suspect certain types of moderate/liberal Republican supporters are probably going to be a little uncomfortable here. We will be fighting for traditional American conservatism no matter who we have to fight against and I'm afraid that's going to piss off some folks.


And I'll borrow a slogan used by the NFRA that I realy like:

"We are the 'Republican' Wing of the Republican Party!""


And that is why FR is yours. Thank you Mr. Robinson!!


1,246 posted on 03/02/2007 6:57:11 PM PST by samiam1972 (http://imrunningforpresident.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

"The answer is in my statements like these:

I've already stated that FR will probably become even more conservative than it already is, through attrition if nothing else. Besides continuing to champion the defense of America, FR just might become the "Conservative Conscience of the Republican Party," ie, we may become a real thorn in the side of moderate/liberal Republicanism. Someone has to try defend the party from completely tossing out traditional American conservatism. Might as well be us.


How many times must I say FR is a conservative site? We do not support abortionism, homosexualism, feminisim, environmentalism, gun control, liberalism, socialism, etc, etc, etc. When I say I suspect we will become even more conservative than we already are, possibly via attrition if nothing else, what do you think I'm referring to? When FR starts pushing hard and I mean hard against abortion, gay marriage, homosexual education forced on our school children, pandering to illegal aliens, gun control, McCaine-Feingold type usurpation, global warming, etc, etc, even if supported or advanced by the GOP, then I fully suspect certain types of moderate/liberal Republican supporters are probably going to be a little uncomfortable here. We will be fighting for traditional American conservatism no matter who we have to fight against and I'm afraid that's going to piss off some folks.


And I'll borrow a slogan used by the NFRA that I realy like:

"We are the 'Republican' Wing of the Republican Party!""


And that is why FR is yours. Thank you Mr. Robinson!!


1,247 posted on 03/02/2007 6:57:13 PM PST by samiam1972 (http://imrunningforpresident.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
1,123 posted on 03/02/2007
Way to go Jim!!   What's the rush anyway, and speaking of "rush",  Rush Lim-Bow hasn't endorsed anyone to date.  It's just too early.   Many republicans fail to realize that the republican party is the party of life, it's pro-life, pro-family and pro, traditional marriage.  Feminism is not in God's plan.  Men and woman were made different with different roles to play in society and to raise a family. God should be worshipped, not the earth.  We have a right to defend: ourselves, property and family.  The current congress was not fiscally conservative, the money was spent faster than it came in.  A social liberal is also a fiscal liberal.  Congress still funds planned parenthood with Title X money, much more than Clinton administration.   Where are the real republicans anyway?
 
The Republican Party is the Pro-Life Party
2004 Republican Party Platform: Supports the Human Life Amendment

1,297 posted on 03/02/2007 8:23:58 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, insects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

1,313 posted on 03/02/2007 9:12:30 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson


1,450 posted on 03/03/2007 8:14:19 AM PST by vox_freedom (Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Bumping.


1,489 posted on 03/04/2007 8:35:49 AM PST by La Enchiladita (Hunter/Poe 2008 "Once again, our government is on the wrong side of the border war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson