Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel seeks all clear for Iran air strike
telegraph.co.uk (excerpt) ^ | February 24, 2007 | Con Coughlin

Posted on 02/24/2007 12:59:47 AM PST by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last
To: panaxanax
To: Israeli Military

Re: Your request dated 2-22-07

Your request for permission has been fully granted on this day 2-24-07. Good luck.

Signed,

The American people that realize Iran is a threat to not only world peace, but your very existence as a free nation.

Love It. Couldn't have said it better!

41 posted on 02/24/2007 4:38:56 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jeffers

Psy-ops?


42 posted on 02/24/2007 5:00:28 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Timbo64

Oh, Israel has them alright.

The question, as always, is whether America will allow Israel free reign to do what we all know needs doing.


43 posted on 02/24/2007 5:04:08 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"but I doubt that Pentagon would want to deal with the fallout resulting from an Israeli Airstrike."

Nice choice of words.

44 posted on 02/24/2007 5:17:18 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
"The question, as always, is whether America will allow Israel free reign to do what we all know needs doing."

Nope. We haven't yet and we won't this time. Israel wasn't involved in the freeing of Kuwait, the invasion of Afghanistan or the invasion of Iraq. And you know why.

(One has to wonder why we call Israel our "strategic partner in the Mideast" when we haven't and won't use them.)

45 posted on 02/24/2007 5:27:32 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Any negotiation with the USA or anyone else is a distraction. The fact that negotiations are happening means that they've already decided on a course of action. The USA, of course, will deny permission, then look the other way as some electronic or radar malfunction is used as the official reason that we didn't see any Israeli warplanes. This gives us an out and allows the good guys to pound the pogies out of the bad guys in the process. The Russians will be watching the whole thing and all we have to do is play Sergeant Schultz ("I know nothing!").
46 posted on 02/24/2007 5:27:43 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

A senior Israeli defence official said negotiations were now underway between the two countries.......

In other words, an un-named source.

That's as far as I got.


47 posted on 02/24/2007 5:29:50 AM PST by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
strategic partner in the Mideast

Because we've not gone "strategic" yet.

Here's the after we do map.


48 posted on 02/24/2007 5:37:14 AM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 11/05/1979.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee

thanks


49 posted on 02/24/2007 5:38:52 AM PST by panaxanax (Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Hey, when are we gonna change "Iraq" to "New Texas"?


50 posted on 02/24/2007 5:40:05 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Can you imagine Hillary's answer if she were the FPOTUS?


51 posted on 02/24/2007 5:41:05 AM PST by gathersnomoss (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
"highest ranks of the pentagon you have stooges"

These stooges are all over the place at the O-5 and above level. I am an O-4 who joined the navy initially as an enlisted man when Reagan was president (Because of Reagan I joined and I even named one of my boys "Reagan"). I cannot begin to tell you how things have changed since 1987. 8 years of Clinton helped shape and promote an officer corps that is soooo in touch with their feelings, but doesn't know much about fighting. While the numbers of active duty soldiers and sailors have greatly declined over the years I bet the number of active duty lawyers has increased exponentially.
52 posted on 02/24/2007 5:42:11 AM PST by ThunderStruck94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
"The USA, of course, will deny permission, then look the other way as some electronic or radar malfunction is used as the official reason that we didn't see any Israeli warplanes."

Gosh, you think the Arabs will buy that? You think they'll just shrug their shoulders and say, "$hit happens"?

(Yes, I know Iranians are Persian, not Arabic, but they are Muslims.)

Better that the Great Satan do this than allowing "the Jews" to do their dirty work for them.

53 posted on 02/24/2007 5:43:47 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Tower to Israeli flight #1, You are clear for take off on run way 1.


54 posted on 02/24/2007 5:44:41 AM PST by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Timbo64

So far I am betting that these revelations in the Brit press are of the nature of calculated intimidation of Iran by our own guys and don't necessarily reflect what is actually occurring.


55 posted on 02/24/2007 5:48:02 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
i tremble to think Israel would do this while Olmert, Livni and Peretz were still in a position to make critical decisions affecting the future of Israel.
56 posted on 02/24/2007 5:49:10 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Of course we will deny permission.
Of course the rest of the world will be suspicious.
The bigger the lie, the easier it is to get away with it.
The world will rant and rave and then some judge will announce who he has decided is the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby and life will go on and the media will go on to the next topic of the week.


57 posted on 02/24/2007 5:51:15 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

"All Clear"...

There...said it...

"Now where did I put my pankcake syrup?"


58 posted on 02/24/2007 5:56:44 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
"The world will rant and rave and then some judge will announce who he has decided is the father"

Were you around in 1973? Do you remember the Arab oil embargo? All we did back then was assist Israel in defending herself during the Yom Kippur War and we ended up with long gas lines and people freezing to death.

If we let Israeli bombers fly over Iraq and "allow the Jews to slaughter innocent Muslim women and children asleep in their beds" -- well, that will make 1973 look like a walk in the park. I can't think of a better way to pi$$ off a billion Muslims.

59 posted on 02/24/2007 6:17:20 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Cheney hints at Iran strike
Herald Sun ^ | February 24, 2007 | Greg Sheridan

Posted on 02/23/2007 12:13:07 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

US Vice-President Dick Cheney has raised the possibility of military action to stop Iran acquiring nuclear weapons.

He has endorsed Republican senator John McCain's proposition that the only thing worse than a military confrontation with Iran would be a nuclear-armed Iran.

In an exclusive interview with The Weekend Australian, Mr Cheney said: "I would guess that John McCain and I are pretty close to agreement."

The visiting Vice-President said that he had no doubt Iran was striving to enrich uranium to the point where they could make nuclear weapons.

He accused Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of espousing an "apocalyptic philosophy" and making "threatening noises about Israel and the US and others".

He also said Iran was a sponsor of terrorism, especially through Hezbollah. However, the US did not believe Iran possessed any nuclear weapons as yet.

"You get various estimates of where the point of no return is," Mr Cheney said, identifying nuclear terrorism as the greatest threat to the world.

"Is it when they possess weapons or does it come sooner, when they have mastered the technology but perhaps not yet produced fissile material for weapons?"

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS:

Below is a YTD time line of events with Iran and our subsequent military buildup besides what we have in Iran and Afghanistan. This time line changes with additions or subtractions as more news related to Iran is posted on Free Republic or elsewhere.

If Tehran Only Knew, what will happen if there is no regime change in Iran.:

"In America, we lie for tactical reasons, stating over and over that military action against Iran is unlikely. However in Iran, out of ignorance, they reiterate that American military action against their country is impossible because the US is "unable" to do so!

We say and hope our analysis is wrong. A possible military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities is in the final stages. Unless a political miracle occurs that revives the halted dialog between Iran and the international community, Iran and its neighboring countries should not be surprised by a scenario that includes American military action. "

Just maybe, President Bush is purposely allowing the media and the left to spout their garbage in order to create the illusion that we are completely incapable of taking any action against Iran. It would come as a complete surprise if we did take action.


Summary of US military buildup in the Persian Gulf area since the first of the year:

Over the past month, the U.S. Navy has given orders to the U.S.S. John Stennis carrier battle group, based in Bremerton, WA, to steam toward the Persian Gulf, where it will join the U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Navy sources say the Pentagon is getting ready to announce the dispatch of a third carrier battle group – the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan – from San Diego. That will make three carrier battle groups in the region starting at around the end of January.

Oh, and along with them is the amphibious assault group led by the U.S.S. Boxer, which can land several thousand U.S. Marines to seize and destroy strategic sites near the coast at a moment’s notice. (Busheir? Bandar Abbas? Jask? The three Persian Gulf islands Iran seized from the UAE in the 1990s and has since fortified to harass Gulf shipping? Your pick).

Other recent US Naval and Marine Corp additions to handle/control/kill the Iranian Serial Killers:

Bataan Transits Suez Canal, Enters U.S. 5th Fleet Story Number: NNS070130-14 Release Date: 1/30/2007 7:00:00 PM

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class (SW) Joanne De Vera, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/ Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet Public Affairs

USS BATAAN, At Sea (NNS) -- The multipurpose amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) and the Sailors and Marines of the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) successfully transited the Suez Canal on Jan. 30 and entered the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations.

While in the region, the Bataan Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG) will conduct maritime security operations (MSO).

MSO help set the conditions for security and stability in the maritime environment, as well as complement the counter-terrorism and security efforts of regional nations. These operations deny international terrorists use of the maritime environment as a venue for attack or to transport personnel, weapons or other material.

U.S. 5th Fleet’s area of operations encompasses 2.5 million square miles of water and includes the Persian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman and parts of the Indian Ocean.

“We’ll continue our role as the surface warfare commander and the air defense commander for the Bataan Expeditionary Strike Group,” said Cmdr. Jon Carriglitto, Bataan’s operations officer. “Together with the MEU, we bring the ability to insert a quick, capable amphibious force where it’s needed.”

While in theater, approximately 6,000 U.S. Sailors and Marines assigned to the ESG and the 26th MEU provide the combatant commander a versatile sea-based force that can be tailored to a variety of missions. The Bataan ESG has the capabilities to support MSO, combat operations and humanitarian assistance/disaster relief.

“Bataan ESG’s presence in the U.S. 5th Fleet will require the crew to conduct what it does best: well deck and flight deck operations,” said Carriglitto. “We’ll be conducting varsity-level operations, but much of it falls right in line with our ongoing training, so I know we’re ready to meet those challenges.”

Bataan, commanded by Capt. David Hulse, left its homeport of Norfolk on Jan. 4 for a regularly-scheduled deployment as the flagship of the Bataan ESG. The ESG is comprised of the Bataan Strike Group, commanded by Commodore Donna Looney, commander, Bataan Strike Group/Amphibious Squadron 2, and the 26th MEU based out of Camp Lejeune, N.C., commanded by Col. Gregg Sturdevant.

In addition to Bataan, the strike group consists of USS Shreveport (LPD 12), USS Oak Hill (LSD 51), USS Vella Gulf (CG 72), USS Nitze (DDG 94), USS Underwood (FFG 36), and USS Scranton (SSN 756).

For related news, visit the Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/cusnc/.

"Due to rapidly developing events in Somalia, U.S. Central Command has tasked USS Dwight D. Eisenhower to join USS Bunker Hill, USS Ramage, USS Anzio and USS Ashland to support ongoing maritime security operations off the coast of Somalia," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Charlie Brown, a spokesman for 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

Aircraft Carrier USS Reagan at Sasebo, Japan (where does it go next?)
AP ^ | 02/24/07

Posted on 02/24/2007 12:04:39 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

An aerial view shows U.S. aircraft carrier USS Ronald W. Reagan sailing into the Sasebo Port, western Japan, Saturday, Feb. 24 2007. The newest nuclear-powered aircraft carrier made a port call at Sasebo U.S. naval base Saturday. (AP Photo/Kyodo News)


TOPICS:

More Iranian related news:

01.31.07

Pentagon official tells LA Times aggressive new tactics designed to deter Iranian assistance to Iraqi militants may include more forceful patrols by fighter planes along Iran-Iraq border to counter smuggling of bomb supplies from Islamic Republic; ‘For every improvised explosive device that goes off in Iraq, a bomb should go off in Iran,’ retired Air Force lieutenant general says.

ynet.news.com

IRAN CLOCK IS TICKING

Thursday, February 01, 2007 - FreeMarketNews.com

LINKED NEWS ANALYSIS

Military and intelligence sources continue to tell me that preparations are advancing for a war with Iran starting possibly as early as mid-to-late February. The sources offer some differences of opinion over whether Bush might cite a provocation from Iran or whether Israel will take the lead in launching air strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

-Consortiumnews.com

8 posted on 02/01/2007 4:24:51 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is Never Free)

A Quote from: The Dogs of War - Lessons of the 20th Century. By Victor Davis Hanson, (author most recently of Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power):

"I would not wish to fight the United States - either militarily, politically, or culturally. For every threat, our history teaches us that Americans offer not just a rejoinder, but the specter of a devastating answer of a magnitude almost inconceivable to those now chanting and threatening in the streets of the Middle East.

Do they have any idea of what sort of dangerous people we really are? Do they understand the history of the names of those ships now off their coasts, like the USS Peleliu or Enterprise, or the pedigree of the 82nd or 101st Airborne?"

In spite of all the reality above, the insane Islamofascist serial killers in charge of Iran are going ahead with naval war games in the Persian Gulf.

Iranian navy, air forces to launch wargames in Persian Gulf, Oman Sea IRNA / Reuters ^

Posted on 02/06/2007 10:20:34 AM PST by maquiladora

Missile units of the air and naval forces of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) will begin a specialized wargame in southern and central parts of Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman from Wednesday.

The announcement follows mounting tension with the United States, which has said it will step up pressure on Iran. This has included despatching a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf, a major shipping lane for oil exports.

The exercises will be staged on Wednesday and Thursday by the missile units of the Guards' naval and air forces, the semi-official Fars news agency reported, citing a Guards source.

Skip to comments.

Second US aircraft carrier arrives near Iran
AFP ^ | 02/20/07

Posted on 02/20/2007 8:15:53 AM PST by nypokerface

MANAMA (AFP) - A second US aircraft carrier has arrived in Middle Eastern waters as promised by US President George W. Bush in January amid an escalating crisis with nearby Iran over its nuclear program.

The USS John C. Stennis and its accompanying strike group joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Sea of Oman but has not yet entered Gulf waters, the US Fifth Fleet said Tuesday from its base in Manama.

The Stennis "entered the US 5th Fleet area of operations... to conduct maritime security operations in regional waters, as well as to provide support for ground forces operating in Afghanistan and Iraq," said a US statement.

Bush on January 10 unveiled his new strategy for Iraq which included deploying a second aircraft carrier group and a Patriot anti-missile defense system "to reassure our friends and allies."

Washington accuses arch-foe Tehran of stoking the insurgency in Iraq and of seeking to develop a nuclear bomb, charges denied by the Islamic republic.

Days after Bush's announcement, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the Stennis's redeployment was a signal to Iran, which, he said, has a "very negative" attitude.

Iran has also been carrying out military exercises in the region, including test-firing missiles and building drones that military commanders boasted could hit the US Navy.

The White House has repeatedly insisted it has no plans to strike Iran, and downplayed the significance of reinforcing the US military presence in the Gulf region.

Earlier this month, Russian President Vladimir Putin criticised the US military build-up in the Gulf, saying it did not fit in with Washington's Iraq strategy.


Our comrades, Pelosi, Reid, Clintoon, Kerry and Kennedy will never allow Bush to attack us!

Hey, what is causing all those bright lights and loud noises!

The nuclear bomb used at Hiroshima was puny compared to what we have ready for the Islamofascist serial killers in Iran:

Atomic blast in Hiroshima

An atomic blast demolished the centre of Hiroshima, Japan, on August 6,1945. Japan agreed to surrender after a second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9.

Iranian Map: Before we unleash the real hell on earth shown below for the Iranian Whackjobs:

Then, we show the suicidal Islamofascist serial killers in charge of Iran, what real nuclear weapons will do.

Iranian Map: After the above!

Besides the obvious air and missile strikes, we can cause a lot of economic problems for Iran using their techniques against them like the following: (Iranian) Pipeline blown up
Daily Times (Pakistan) ^ | February 21st, 2007

Posted on 02/21/2007 2:41:24 AM PST by M. Espinola

Quetta: Suspected Baloch militants blew up a gas pipeline near Quetta on Tuesday, cutting supplies to a power plant and several areas, a gas company official said. Gas supplies were cut to four districts near Quetta and a 95 MW city power plant. Supplies might be restored to some areas within 24 hours, Nawaz said. No one was hurt in the early morning blast in the outskirts of Quetta. “They planted explosives under an 18-inch pipeline that blew out a 4-foot piece of the pipe,” said Sheikh Nawaz, general manager of Sui Southern Gas Company. agencies


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: ENERGY; IRAN; NATURALGAS; NAWAZ; OIL; QUETTA;



Click The Pic To Donate


60 posted on 02/24/2007 6:45:17 AM PST by Grampa Dave (GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson