I posted to see if anyone had heard anything lately on this trial and to get your thoughts.
I've been reading the semi-transcript on a liberal blog; my take is that the first prosecuting attorney (last name begins with Z)was not sufficiently clear to make his case. Libby's attorney, Wells, wasted a good deal of time in a personal hissy fit, but pretty well destroyed Russert's credibility for any open-minded person. Jeffrees was MUCH better for the defense - clear, concise, easy to follow; very effective (even the libs admitted this). Then Wells was up again and muddied the waters again. Apparently tried some unconvincing theatrics at his close. As one lib blogger said, if I'm charged with perjury, Jeffrees (and not Wells) is the attorney I would want.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1787873/posts
Check out this thread...