Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why John McCain
The Wall Street Journal ^ | February 20, 2007 | Phill Gram

Posted on 02/19/2007 11:42:10 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

Four years ago I decided to quit while I was ahead and concluded my 24-year political career. When I left the Senate, I also left the public policy debate and talking-head role to those actually in the arena. However, because I believe that the 2008 presidential election will be the most important election since 1980, I have decided to rejoin the national debate and exercise my right as a private citizen to express a strongly held opinion about who should be elected, and why.

--SNIP--

Today's mortal need is for a leader who trusts our people enough to tell them the truth about the festering domestic problems that have been swept under the rug for a quarter-century. We need a president who can face up to these problems even as he leads an increasingly reluctant country in a war against a dangerous enemy that will follow us home from any battlefield on which we are defeated.

Where is such a leader to be found? American history gives us a clue where to look: When the times have required great leaders in the past, they seem to have been there all the while, just waiting to be called. John Adams wrote in his diary in 1774 that "We have not Men, fit for the Times. We are deficient in Genius, in Education, in Travel, in Fortune -- in every Thing. I feel unutterable Anxiety."

Yet, at that very moment, the greatest assemblage of leadership the world has ever known was emerging all around him. We seem, for some reason, to be able to see greatness only in the rearview mirror.

I believe the man we need to meet the mortal need today is here. He is experienced, but has not lost his common sense or his ability to be outraged.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2007 11:42:11 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Well, who is Graham saying is the man???


2 posted on 02/19/2007 11:45:04 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Thank you Mr. Gram

You may now feel free to sit down and STFU.

Thanks in advance.

L

3 posted on 02/19/2007 11:45:33 PM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Phil Gram is a man to truely respect. McNut backed Phils run for POTUS. Loyalty is very important but, McNut ain`t Phil Gram. Don`t really understand thjis but, McNut has my vote if he wins the nomination.


4 posted on 02/19/2007 11:49:40 PM PST by neverhillorat (IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

abm
anybody but mccain
he is a hot head and a loser
no chance of beting hillary or ever doing something to please conservatives.


5 posted on 02/19/2007 11:55:11 PM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

McCain for President?
When pigs fly, and America has lost her soul.

Semper Fi


6 posted on 02/19/2007 11:57:08 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
because I believe that the 2008 presidential election will be the most important election since 1980,

Ding. Ding. You are awarded the prize for being the first to use that canard in the 2008 election cycle, Mr. Gramm!

We heard it in '88, we heard it in '92, we heard it in '96, we heard it in 2000, we heard it in 2004. And I believed it and acted on it--held my nose and voted against the worse of the two candidates.

Now we see that it wasn't true in those elections, and it isn't true today. We're past being fooled again. No more, "Your bozo is worse than my bozo. It's the most important election since [fill in blank], so I HAVE to vote for my bozo."

Nope. If I vote this election, it will be FOR someone; it won't matter in 20 years which wing of the bi-factional ruling party wins; and, although I will be accused of wasting my vote, I will have actually cast a meaningful vote which, as momentum grows and more people see the light, will finally break the stranglehold of the current dominant parties.

The only question is, "Can it happen soon enough to save the Republic?"

7 posted on 02/19/2007 11:57:33 PM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat
When pigs fly, and America has lost her soul.

So we only need that pigs flying thing then. Right?

L

8 posted on 02/19/2007 11:59:45 PM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Et tu, Philus?


9 posted on 02/20/2007 12:05:49 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
McCain died, as far as I'm concerned when he pushed the McCain Feingold bill. After that I could care less how he feels about abortion, immigration, terror, etc. He will never get a vote from me.
10 posted on 02/20/2007 12:06:18 AM PST by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Any candidate who brazenly attacks the First Amendment doesn't pass the Dickie Flatt test.


11 posted on 02/20/2007 12:06:23 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

John McCain: The Republican candidate endorsed by the New York Times for 2008. That's all you need to know.


12 posted on 02/20/2007 12:08:42 AM PST by Quick or Dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Did McCain pay him to write that, or did Phil go bonkers?


13 posted on 02/20/2007 12:09:00 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Phil, you ignorant slut.


14 posted on 02/20/2007 12:09:36 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Well, who is Graham saying is the man???

Good question, because it sure isn't McCain.

15 posted on 02/20/2007 12:12:22 AM PST by GATOR NAVY (Naming CVNs after congressmen and mediocre presidents burns my butt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Well, this time it happens to be true. We don't have Reagan vs. Carter, but in a lot of ways the stakes are even higher than they were then, and I'll be damned if I'll let "Real conservatives" in a snit let Shrillary or any of her wanna-be cohorts get into the White House.

Better a McNut who has a shot than a McNobody who doesn't have a chance.

16 posted on 02/20/2007 12:14:32 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel-Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

To quote a great American:

"John McCain, you treasonous bastard, . . . How dare you even think that you are qualified to sit in the oval office! Ronald Reagan's office! President? Hah! You miserable excuse for a two-bit political hack, you're not even qualified to shine Ronald Reagan's boots. If you do run, I'm afraid you're gonna be at least one vote short. It'll be a cold day in hell before a traitor like you ever receives my vote. And that's a campaign promise you can take to the bank."


17 posted on 02/20/2007 12:19:10 AM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: swanny
McCain is tied for last place as to who I would want to have the nomination, and I'll pray as hard and often as I can that he doesn't get it...

That's why we're talking about this now. I'm not worried about what to do IF McCain gets the nomination, I want to stop him now so I don't even have to deal with that situation.

19 posted on 02/20/2007 1:08:23 AM PST by GATOR NAVY (Naming CVNs after congressmen and mediocre presidents burns my butt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
We need a lottery, McCain, Mitt or Rudy. Who drops out first?
20 posted on 02/20/2007 1:31:51 AM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson