Posted on 02/17/2007 4:38:47 PM PST by Dog Gone
So I was off by 4 years :)
But other than that, I think my point still stands.
..Everybody was SURE the nominee was going to be Cuomo--Clinton came out of nowhere...
And so why do some seem to think that it's so far-fetched for the same thing to happen for Duncan Hunter and the Republican nomination?
P.S. Have you considered holding your breath till you turn blue? How about throwing yourself on the floor at some mall and streaming?
streaming? = Screaming?
No, I think a Rudy nomination for the republican party would be it's death. We're talkin' gangrene here, and amputatable.
..I'm not prepared to argue against your point
But as was pointed out to me (which I knew) Clinton had a plan (which came to fruition 4 years earlier than he anticipated) and a bankroll--which in todays world the requirement could be as much as a $100 million...
To come from so far back would take an act of God--which, from my perspective, is never impossible...
With regard to the war on terror, Rudy is one of the reasons that three (3) illegal alien Middle Easterns terrorists were among the Middle Eastern terrorists that killed nearly three thousand (3,000) Americans on September 11, 2001. Those three (3) were illegal aliens by virtue of their visas having expired.
Rudy supports rewarding millions of illegal aliens with legal status and a path to citizenship. Rudy would allow millions of illegal aliens who are living in the United States after their visas have expired to obtain legal status and a path to citizenship.
I'm supporting Rep. Tancredo. However, if he doesn't run or has dropped out by the time of the Tennessee primary, I will vote for Duncan Hunter if he still running for president at that time.
Duncan Hunter is a true patriot and a true conservative. He will secure this nation's borders.
Rudy is a liberal, pro-abortion, pro-illegal alien RINO.
No, it's not odd at all.
Has anyone answered your questions thus far?
Clinton was a governor. A fresh face who made major inroads into the DLC at the time. I distinctly remember warning my wife about Clinton in 1989 while we were on vacation.
She had never heard of him.
While he was a relatively unknown person at the time, times were also different. You have instant credibility as the governor of a state. Congressman frankly come in with a negative reputation which they must overcome.
I'm still looking for the gameplan that makes Hunter a contender later this year. It hasn't been offered here yet.
Or some of us will vote our conscience and cast our ballot to an authentic conservative who runs as an independent or 3rd party candidate, thereby splitting the Republican vote and ensuring a victory for the Democrat Party.
So why don't we avoid that whole mess by nominating an authentic conservative in the first place?
His problem is he is a slave to an inflexible rules-based idealogy. In the real world you can't adher to low-level rules-base programming.
By "him" I meant Ron Paul.
And like a child...I don't care
Although I have no idea why you also mention the troops in reference to my post
You truly have no idea? Try this: CIC Hillary. Do you really think they want her as their CIC? I'll wager farms I don't own that they don't.
Clinton, like Carter, were 'chosen' candidates, media and liberal establishment creations. They did not just 'pop up' on the national stage by their lonesome.
Let me cut to the chase here... you are just a bleeting fool, delustional, naive, and quite confused.
LOL, not really, although a couple tried.
It's okay, it's been a good discussion and it hasn't degenerated into a flame war.
Lately, that's considered progress around here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.