[Peach]

I see some people have not read the article, which seems to happen a lot around here.

FR couldn't take down Donald Duck these days, let alone Dan Rather.

From the article:

But Kislin said that he and his company were cleared of any suspicion in that investigation and that he received a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles in 1996 notifying him that he no longer was a target. He provided the Center with a copy of the letter, which says, in part, that the prosecutors had "declined to pursue a civil penalty action against Trans Commodities or Sam Kislin."

[PhiKapMom]

But Kislin said that he and his company were cleared of any suspicion in that investigation and that he received a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles in 1996 notifying him that he no longer was a target. He provided the Center with a copy of the letter, which says, in part, that the prosecutors had "declined to pursue a civil penalty action against Trans Commodities or Sam Kislin."

In 1996? The Feds cleared him of any charges under a Clinton Administration? More of the same on this website. This is starting to make FR look foolish when people don't bother to read.

[musicman]

"FR couldn't take down Donald Duck these days, let alone Dan Rather."

Peach,(sorry this is OT) you reminded me of this from MY archives (I took the pic of the TV live)and I don't know if Buckhead ever saw it to maybe save a copy....:

[dirtboy]

FR couldn't take down Donald Duck these days, let alone Dan Rather.

It's not duck season. It's RINO season.