[HEY4QDEMS]

From the article:
Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson said the civil complaint mirrors ethics charges the North Carolina State Bar has filed against Nifong, and he issued an order Monday that would defer Brewer's complaint until after the State Bar hearing in the case is completed.

Why on earth should Ms. Brewer have a problem with this ruling?
Does she have a personal axe to grind?

[JLS]

Because from all press accounts of the law it is ILLEGAL. The press account seem to say that Hudson must within 30 days:

1. Pass this on to another judge.

2. Remove Nifong.

3. Go on record saying he will not remove a DA who has hidden evidence.

There is apparently not a provision for him to issue a stay. BTW, this is the mechanism to remove a DA. The NC Bar technically at least can not do that. The NC bar can disbar, that can not be done by this court. So the two proceedures are different and lead to different sanctions.

There is a systematic problem in getting NC to follow the law in this case. This seems to be one more example.

[chesley]

We should all have a personal axe to grind with Nifong.

[rockrr]

Does she have a personal axe to grind?

I read on another thread that she lost to him in the last election. As much as I think her complaint against him was warranted, it would have been better served by someone who didn't have such an obvious "axe to grind"...