Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb; Howlin; All

The Chronical of Higher Education has an interesting article on the division among Duke Faculty:

"One Ad, 88 Professors, and No Apologies

Nearly a year after the lacrosse scandal broke, Duke professors are still divided over their reactions to it

By THOMAS BARTLETT and SARA LIPKA

Last month Duke University's student newspaper published a letter signed by 17 economics professors. The letter seemed innocent enough. It said that, in the wake of last spring's lacrosse scandal, the professors regretted the perception that Duke faculty members were prejudiced against some students. It also publicly welcomed all students — including lacrosse players — to enroll in the professors' classes.

The letter provoked sharp responses from other professors. Was the economics department implying that other departments did not welcome lacrosse players? ....."

Click below to read the entire article:

http://chronicle.com/temp/email2.php?id=pgnsygNsqBnbzXbPKJcrZSxFWTzkmzQz


12 posted on 02/12/2007 3:21:46 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: abb; Howlin

Professor Weintraub discusses claims of McCarthyism:

"Disagreement is not McCarthyism

By: E. Roy Weintraub
Issue date: 2/14/07 Section: Letters
Last update: 2/14/07 at 7:00 AM EST

I have read the "flyer" for Monday's "Shut Up and Teach" panel discussion, with its reference to Joseph McCarthy, suggesting that dark forces are trying to silence some politically minded Duke faculty.

In the late 1940s, my father, an economist, was attacked in newspaper editorials in The Brooklyn Eagle for teaching communism to nice Catholic boys at St. Johns University. He was, of course, an early Keynesian. In the late 1940s, the man who would become my doctoral adviser had to leave the United States for almost a decade to avoid the agitated involvement of the Regents of the University of Michigan in his tenure case, based on his admitted connection with the Communist Party as a graduate student and young instructor. In those years with the Smith Act in place, one could be jailed for being a Communist Party member. That he was doing the work for which he would later win the Nobel Prize mattered not at all to the Regents."




http://media.www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2007/02/14/Letters/Disagreement.Is.Not.Mccarthyism-2719267.shtml?sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com&MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com


13 posted on 02/14/2007 7:31:43 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson