Might be so, except there was no Declaration of War. A technicality made the Declaration unnecessary, but not having the Declaration also made all this aid and encouragement of enemies legal.
Treason hhhhhhhhmmmmmmmm Jane Fonda?????
Kind of sideways to the topic, but, I don't think we should ever again send our troops into battle without a Declaration of War. We've done so under the guise of police action, humanitarian and in the most recent case under the guise of enforcing a UN resolution. I don't see the UN anywhere in our constitution. We should not pick and choose which provisions we will enforce and which ones we will not. These "extra-military" adventures pretty much all end up right where we are with Iraq. Bunch of dead heroes, politically divided and non-committal to winning. If there isn't anything to win, we shouldn't be there. Before labeling me a "cut-n-run", I am only discussing how we enter these engagements..
I have gone back and cannot find where in the Constitution it says we need a declaration of war to have treason. Please advise which section or article that is under please.