To: RJL
Every other report I've read said the illegal drug smuggler ran back...What reports? WND? The info. I read, from the D.A.'s office (your pal J.Sutton), states they shot him, hit him in the bootoks, and left him laying were he fell. Then picked up the spent brass.
To: muleskinner
What reports? WND? The info. I read, from the D.A.'s office (your pal J.Sutton) No no, not my pal. Tar & feathers followed by running him into Mexico on a rail is far too good for Johnny Sutton.
I may have been unclear, but as I have since clarified, I am firmly and absolutely on the side of the Border Patrol Agents Messrs. Ramos & Compean.
30 posted on
02/10/2007 3:13:22 PM PST by
RJL
To: muleskinner
What reports? WND? The info. I read, from the D.A.'s office ...WND has and admits what's motivating their coverage, ie their bias. The real question is is what is motivating Sutton? Drug money, a wide open boarder preference from DC, blackmail or (it is a long shot) integrity?
The latter seems less plausible considering:
- the charge he prosecuted carried the greatest prison time of any charge he could have brought
- the lies told to congress
- the firing of the witnesses who testified against the agents
- that a drug pirate knew how to get in touch with a HLS brass
- in order to get these two behind bars a known Mexican drug runner slime was given the get out of jail free card
- at least two of the jurors said they were not given proper instructions
- this whole thing smells like two week old fish...
Only an fool would not question Sutton and what is really going on. The facts right now seem to be a casualty of someones agenda. Transcripts please - oh and pardon the agents!
35 posted on
02/10/2007 3:27:53 PM PST by
DaveyB
(Ignorance is part of the human condition - atheism makes it permanent!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson