Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warner to Oppose Vote on Own Resolution
Powerline ^ | 2/3/07

Posted on 02/03/2007 8:58:13 AM PST by Valin

Senator John Warner will join what appears to be a unanimous Senate Republican caucus in opposing a Senate vote on his anti-Bush administration resolution, unless competing resolutions are also voted on:

"Senator Warner supports the Senate Republican leadership's effort to establish a free and open debate on Iraq on the Senate floor, including possible amendments," a spokesman for the Virginia Republican said yesterday afternoon. Earlier in the day, Mr. Warner told colleagues during a closed-door strategy meeting at the Library of Congress that he opposes the manner in which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, is conducting debate on his resolution, which condemns Mr. Bush's plan to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq.

Senate Republicans are opposed to a vote on the Warner resolution unless they also get votes on two other resolutions. One of those alternatives supports Mr. Bush's plan, and the other would prohibit cutting funds for the war. Republicans also want each resolution to require 60 votes to pass.

As I understand the news accounts, Mitch McConnell has succeeded in getting his caucus unanimously behind this position, if not behind a single resolution:

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, told reporters yesterday that he expects to have all 49 Republicans in the chamber -- nine votes more than are needed for a filibuster -- to vote Monday to block the nonbinding resolution. It will be interesting to see what emerges from this maneuvering. The most likely outcome, I think, is that the Senate's lack of consensus over the best path forward in Iraq will be plainly revealed, and the net effect of all this resolution-writing will be close to zero. That's the best we can hope for, I think.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 117republicans; resolutions; thepledge
Click on source for links
1 posted on 02/03/2007 8:58:15 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

Is it just me or is Warner a pompous moron?


2 posted on 02/03/2007 8:59:16 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Bloviating for the sake of bloviating.
What an embarassment!


3 posted on 02/03/2007 9:02:00 AM PST by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Democrats would call him a useful idiot; Virginia Conservatives (a dwindling minority, I know being one of them) would call him a traitor. I'd recommend that he retire but then we could expect our Demo governor to appoint another Jim Webb... Whatever happened to the great Commonwealth of Virginia?


4 posted on 02/03/2007 9:04:33 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds (“The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Warner is from a different planet.


5 posted on 02/03/2007 9:04:35 AM PST by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin

He needs to have his mental status checked lest he propose a military attack on Venus.


6 posted on 02/03/2007 9:08:43 AM PST by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Ah...NO! It's not just you. The man is a legend in his own mind. OTOH he got to boff Liz Tayllor OTOOH so did about 73,290 other guys.


7 posted on 02/03/2007 9:11:42 AM PST by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zarf

He's a jackass!


8 posted on 02/03/2007 9:20:40 AM PST by processing please hold (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I don't think you are reading this article carefully. I hope it's true. Warner and McConnell have maneuvered the GOP into supporting a filibuster. Unless the Senate ALSO votes a promise to fund the war. Which will mean the nonsupport resolution will conflict with the Senate's action supporting Bush's plan.

Also, you have missed that Reid had to drop the democrat resolution and support Warner's, which lacks the most offensive language of the dem draft. IF this article is true the democrats are screwed.

9 posted on 02/03/2007 9:28:43 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan
This relates to what I mentioned earlier.

Owl_Eagle

If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.

10 posted on 02/03/2007 9:38:59 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Elizabeth Taylor needs to reenter his life and pull this fool off the stage.


11 posted on 02/03/2007 9:39:53 AM PST by Buck W. (If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf; All

Hmmmmm?? I wonder if some of the pompous morons finally read the list of over 35,000 pledge takers on Hugh Hewitt's website ..?? If so .. maybe reality is starting to sink in .. the repubs didn't lose the election because of the war .. they lost the election because we're sick and tired of them kissing the behinds of the dems.

We're also sick and tired of the corruption, and the total disconnect with the voters. I signed the pledge .. and I will not support any repub who voted for any resolution which tries to ursurp the authority of the president.


12 posted on 02/03/2007 9:53:32 AM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Maybe my scathing e-mail to Warner, and a letter to the NRSC, and signing the pledge, had some effect on Johnny Boy.


13 posted on 02/03/2007 9:57:40 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Warner can't decide whose side he's on. On moment he gives aid and comfort to the terrorists with his backstabbing "resolution" and basks in the glow of predictably glowing praise from the treasonous scum at the Washington Post. Now,it appears he may be having second thoughts. At BEST, an insincere and cowardly poseur.


14 posted on 02/03/2007 3:01:59 PM PST by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson