Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Black Republican for Bush
"And picking Miers wipes out all of the other conservative judges he selected, right? "

His reaction to that pick being questioned doesn't help.

"Face it babe, that was the weakest part of your argument."

"Babe"?

"That was something stated for consumption in the Muslim world."

I doubt it, considering we have CAIR "training" TSA to this day.

"After all, since we have troops in their thousands in two Muslim nations, it makes sense to reassure people of that faith that our fight isn't with their religion, but with extremists"

Ah, but it IS with their religion. If you cannot name the enemy, you will not defeat him. The President has attempted to fight this war as a PC "police action", telling us all along that it would be a long war. It doesn't have to be a long war, but his Administration has a Wilsonian view of Democracy and nation-building - something he promised in 2000 he wouldn't do.

I take it you accept the other actions that would point to being a moderate, not a conservative?
144 posted on 01/19/2007 7:28:45 AM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: EnochPowellWasRight

There are two types of conservatives in general, religious conservatives and small govt/movement conservatives. Many religious conservatives do not believe in smaller govt for its own sake. Movement conservatives want smaller govt but a significant number are not enamored of the conservative social agenda of the religious Right. If someone believes some social spending is needed to better our society, it does not necessarily make them liberal or moderate. I believe that you have much too narrow a view of conservatism. In my opinion, liberalism involves a belief that throwing massive amounts of money at a problem is a solution. That's not my conviction. Take inner city poverty for instance. I believe that having more marriages and far fewer babies out of wedlock would help solve many problems in our cities. Greatly increasing the number of two parent families where the parents are adults with stable jobs would do far more to alleviate poverty than pumping billion after billion into programs. So would a greater interest and a greater motivation to do well in academics. But improving the schools with better books, smaller classes, and improved infrastructure surely would have a positive impact as well. That's pragmatic conservatism, something that more of us should give some consideration to, instead of rigid doctrine.--Mark


163 posted on 01/19/2007 5:19:47 PM PST by Black Republican for Bush (Never trust a democrat with foreign policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson