Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Were all the pundits wrong about Hillary's strength?
Reason Online, Rasmussen Reports ^ | 01.17.07 | David Weigel, Chris Reed

Posted on 01/17/2007 4:10:59 PM PST by Mia T

Were all the pundits wrong about Hillary's strength?

by Chris Reed at January 17, 2007 10:50 AM


For years, the assumption has been nearly universal that Hillary Clinton would have an easy path to the 2008 Dem nomination. She had the money, the establishment support and the great goodwill among Democrats for the first Clinton administration going for her.

Well, maybe everyone was wrong. Reason Online's David Weigel makes the case:

 

Reason Magazine

Anyone But Hillary

 

 Rasmussen Reports has been polling the Democratic field, and today they measure the strength of Hillary Clinton's presidential bid: She's down to 22 percent support in the primary and fading fast.

That's one poll with a sizable (5 percent) margin of error, but it's an incredibly weak showing for Clinton.

Illinois Senator Barack Obama (D) formally announced his plans to run for President and instantly finds himself near the top of the heap. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of 401 Likely Democratic Primary Voters finds that 22% favor New York Senator Hillary Clinton (D) while 21% prefer Obama. Obama has consistently been in second place in several Rasmussen Reports polls, but this is the first time he has been in a virtual tie with the former First Lady.

John Edwards polls at 15 percent; he's up 6 since the last poll, Obama's up 4. Hillary is down 12 points from the last poll in early December.

How sad is this for Clinton? In 1999 we (blessedly) didn't start the presidential race this early, but Texas Gov. George Bush was coming in around
40 percent support in Republican primary polls. A poll taken by Opinion Research Corporation (CNN's pollster, now that Gallup's split off from the network) in Jan 6-11, 1999, had Bush at 40 percent, Elizabeth Dole at 22 percent, Jack Kemp at 8, and a bunch of single-digiters including Dan Quayle and some guy named John McCain. Most Republicans had heard of Bush (or thought he was his dad) and kind of liked him. Every Democrat knows who Hillary Clinton is, and almost 4/5 of them are looking for another candidate. It's a blow to the vaunted "support the war, don't support Grand Theft Auto" playbook.

The punchline: This poll was taken before Obama announced he was in the race.

I would add that Rasmussen Reports, while derided in some establishment media circles as an unworthy upstart, had a pretty darn good track record in the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns.



HANGING HILLARY: ClintoNNpolls fraud
How the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor 6

A FREE REPUBLIC EXCLUSIVE by Howlin1

by Mia T, 01.17.07










n 12 January, in a FreeRepublic.com exclusive, Howlin broke the story of incipient clinton-CNN presidential polling fraud1 and here it is five days later and nothing. No reporting of it anywhere by old media.

Figures.

To old media, this sort of thing is not news.

It's business.

As usual.

In the weeks and months ahead, watch for the clintons to become increasingly desperate, (which means: watch for their corruption to become increasingly flagrant).

Obama-mania, fueled primarily by the hillary dud factor, is spoiling the clintons' plans. Obama's charisma and blank slate are the perfect antidote to hillary's repulsiveness and baggage.

So what's a ruthless power-hungry couple to do?

Well, the one thing they must do -- and do quickly -- is to get control of the presidential polling mechanism. The clintons must manufacture polls that will convince the primary voters not to believe their lying eyes.



MORE 'HILLARY DUD' MITIGATION:

THE 'MATERNALIZATION' OF HILLARY
(CLINTON MACHINE DUMPS THATCHER FOR 'MOTHER')

HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR 5

SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR 4

THREE WOMEN AND A FUNERAL:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR 3

REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR 2

SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR




P.S. Listen to the husband. Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the missus.... Hmmm....



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007





FR EXCLUSIVE - CNN hires Clinton-controlled Opinion Research Corp. for 2008 Presidential Polling

FreeRepublic.com Exclusive | January 12, 2007

by Howlin
Posted on 01/12/2007 3:44:08 PM EST


Today CNN announced that "The CNN Poll will become the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll" -

Press release - CNN and Opinion Research Announce Formal Polling Partnership

PRINCETON, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Opinion Research Corporation, a leading provider of global market research and consulting services, today announced the establishment of a formal polling partnership with CNN, one of the world's most respected and trusted sources for news and information. The CNN Poll will become the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll.

"Opinion Research Corporation's reputation for independent, objective analysis and its excellent reputation in the industry make the firm the ideal polling partner for CNN," said Sam Feist, CNN's Political Director. "As the network gears up to offer the most in-depth and expansive coverage of the 2008 election, Opinion Research Corporation will be a key part of giving viewers the accurate and relevant information they demand to help them make decisions."

Opinion Research Corp. website - www.opinionresearch.com

Based on the history of the people who recently acquired Opinion Research Corp., we believe that the true purpose of the CNN/Opinion Research partnership is to rig the poll results to benefit Hillary Clinton in her 2008 presidential campaign.

Opinion Research was purchased last year by InfoUSA. InfoUSA is controlled by a hard-core Clintonista named Vinod Gupta.

Gupta is a major Clinton/DNC donor and fundraiser, and Lincoln Bedroom guest. He has recently spent large sums to establish these Clinton-worship centers in India -

The Bill Clinton Science and Technology Center

Gochar Intermediate College, Rampur Maniharan

The Center was founded to help Scientists, Engineers and Doctors better perform their duties in a professional manner and be a part of the process of technological advancement. The campus covers more than 10 acres and is home to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Agricultural Labs and a Computer Science Center. It is Vinod's desire that some of those who study at the WJCST Center gain admission to medical and engineering colleges.

The Hillary Rodham Clinton Mass Communication Center

Having provided a basic curriculum at the Women's Polytechnic and Science Center, Vinod now has bigger plans to transform the lives of young men and women. This new center will include training in Journalism, Communications, Public Relations, Media Management, Television Presentation/Anchoring and Web Design.

Gupta manipulated InfoUSA's acquisition of Opinion Research to his personal benefit last year by purchasing shares in Opinion Research, then using his position as chairman of InfoUSA to orchestrate the acquisition of O.R.C. at a nearly 100% premium - thus driving up the value of his O.R.C. shares at the expense of his IUSA shareholders. This sleazy transaction was described last year in a New York Times article

Due to adverse publicity during an IUSA proxy battle last year, Gupta removed his personal web site (www.vingupta.com) which contained several photos of him getting cozy with the Clintons.

We have obtained several photos of Gupta getting hot and sweaty with the Clintons from his deleted web site -

Given the close personal and financial ties between the man who controls Opinion Research Corp. and the Clintons, we believe that the CNN/Opinion Research polling results are hopelessly tainted and intended to benefit Hillary Clinton's presidential bid. CNN either failed to perform due diligence on their partner, or they are complicit in this polling sham.


THE DECLINE OF HILLARY CLINTON: THE DYNAMICS
(SHE HAS ONLY ONE WAY TO GO. AND IT ISN'T UP.)


THE POLITICS OF DUMPING HILLARY


'HILLARY'S BIGGEST PROBLEM... SHE'S OLD NEWS'


THE ABSURDITY OF HILLARY
(What the media and Dick Morris aren't telling us about Obama-clinton numbers.)



TONGUE-IN-CHEEK WARNING ABOUT CLINTON OVAL-OFFICE FELLATION ACTUALIZED
SPELLS TROUBLE AHEAD FOR HILLARY
(Were the clintons blackmailed by Russia?)


HILLARY ON THE COUCH
IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?



THE 'MATERNALIZATION' OF HILLARY
(CLINTON MACHINE DUMPS THATCHER FOR 'MOTHER')

HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR 5


HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON: WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY


THE ACCIDENTAL APTNESS OF MISSUS CLINTON'S 'PRESIDENTIAL' MAKEOVER


HILLARY CLINTON DONS THATCHER GETUP (new proof!) BUT--oops!--EVOKES THE WRONG MARGARET


A HILLARY 'LANDSLIDE'??? NOT SO FAST, MISSUS CLINTON....


WILL HILLARY CLINTON RUN?
COMBINATORIAL GAME THEORY MAY PROVIDE THE ANSWER



FACTORING HILLARY: WHY WE MUST DUMP MISSUS CLINTON NOW


HILLARY CLINTON THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK 2 WEEKS AFTER BILL CLINTON RAPED HER (VIDEO)


FOWL AFTERTASTE
(why we must choose our turkeys with a tad more forethought)


TOP 10 REASONS TO DUMP HILLARY CLINTON ON NOVEMBER 7
(And she thinks New Yorkers should return her to office why?)



HILLARY 'the smartest woman in the world' CLINTON USED GYP SHEETS IN DEBATE WITH SPENCER AND BOMBED ANYWAY


HILLARY'S PLANS: A DEBATE VIGNETTE





CARVILLE AGITPROP + THE CLINTON JACKBOOT
'THE POWER OF HILLARY': THE TITLE



CARVILLE'S 'Clinton is electable! Clear the way!' BATTLE CRY SPELLS TROUBLE FOR HILLARY


Nina Burleigh: Do the Right Thing, Hillary


'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?


HILLARY'S EXPOSED LEFT FLANK 'SCARES THE HORSES' (VIDEO)



IS REUTERS SENDING A MESSAGE ABOUT A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY?



ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY
THE ALTERNATE UNIVERSE OF ANNE KORNBLUT



HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY


THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)


SEE VIDEO: "HILLARY IS 'DOOMED'" (more 'plantation' fallout)


SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR
4


THREE WOMEN AND A FUNERAL:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR
3


REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor2


SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor


HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes


ON ICE: WM. JEFFERSON'S FREEZER vs. THE WM. JEFFERSON CLINTONS' SWISS ACCOUNTS


How To Get Rich Quick In Shady Land Deals Like Harry Reid and hillary clinton


THE DRAMATIC INCREASE IN HILLARY CLINTON'S DISCLOSED ASSETS: An Alternative Theory


WHEN CATTLE FUTURES ARE THE FUTURE:
HILLARY CLINTON'S COW TRADES AS PROGNOSTIC




THE RUBES' GOLDBERG MACHINE
A STATE OF PERPETUAL CLINTON BEGGARY




HILLARY REMEMBERS


HILLARY DOES NOT RECALL, DOES NOT REMEMBER, HAS NO MEMORY, HAS NO RECOLLECTION, BUT DOES NOT BELIEVE SHE SAID IT BECAUSE SHE WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED IF SHE DID.


'REFUSAL TO LEVEL WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'... IS HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON'S MIDDLE NAME

Sen. 'KnowNothing Victim' Clinton Holds News Conference
EFFECTIVELY PLEADS 5th BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE



HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)




COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; corruption; dud; electionpresident; elections; hillary; shewhomustnotbenamed; voldemort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2007 4:11:05 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jla

ping


2 posted on 01/17/2007 4:15:54 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Keep it up Mia.
You ARE a little Hillery nuts but you do good work, thanks
Again keep digging.
(-:


3 posted on 01/17/2007 4:17:32 PM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

ping


4 posted on 01/17/2007 4:18:06 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
thanx... I think ;)...

Let's not confuse the messenger with the message, Joe.... ;)

HILLARY ON THE COUCH
IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?



5 posted on 01/17/2007 4:24:40 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks Mia-keep up the good work.


6 posted on 01/17/2007 4:24:44 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I still think it will be Hillary/Obama, but I did have an interesting thought just now. If the Dems actually (really & truly) dis Hillary and look elsewhere, I wonder if Clintonista victims who have been paid off will finally start talking. I can dream.


7 posted on 01/17/2007 4:25:55 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; joanie-f; ...

ping


8 posted on 01/17/2007 4:28:13 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unkus

thanks :)


9 posted on 01/17/2007 4:34:00 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Honest I meant only as a comliment.
You do good work and I love it.


10 posted on 01/17/2007 4:38:47 PM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I think victims will be coming forward in either case.


11 posted on 01/17/2007 4:40:48 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

No problem. That's how I took it. Just couldn't resist the segue. ;)


12 posted on 01/17/2007 4:42:34 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gonzo

ping


13 posted on 01/17/2007 4:43:46 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Do you remember in early December of 2003 the media told us John Kerry didn't have a chance at the 2004 Democratic nomination. The only way he even had enough money to stay in the race was by morgaging his home. A lot of posts were made here on FR asking if it was really his wifes house he was putting in hock.

Kerry in early December of 2003, according to the press, was getting few if any donations and even fewer supporters for the Democratic nomination.

Do you recall that the hot candidate for the Democratic nomination in early December of 2003 was Dr. Howard Dean. Dean you'll recall had this fantastic ability to raise huge sums of money on the INTERNET. He was the high teck candidate and certain to be the Democratic Nominee?

The media is all hype.

Hillary will be the nominee in 2008 and her running mate will not be Obama. Remember Bill in 1992? He chose a running mate that was boring and dull. There is no way either Bill or Hillary would select a running mate that could out shine them. She will have a dull booring running mate just like Bill had in 1992.

Remember Bill chose Gore because he was dull and booring and all the comparisons to Bill would be favorable to Bill.

14 posted on 01/17/2007 4:50:38 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I hope you are right.


15 posted on 01/17/2007 4:51:02 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I appreciate the article. But as you know more than most - the Clinton Mafia Machine infects and touches untold thousands of apparatchniks. Obama is a mere fly to flick...one way or another. If they can't buy him off (with a vp nomination, for instance), they will find ways to take care of him.....maybe he has a sibling that might get hit by a truck - twice - to get the message across. But I believe the CMM will be more subtle - hints here, hisses there, planted in just the right places. Obama will be a mere whiff in the wind by 2008.


16 posted on 01/17/2007 4:52:00 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Re: representation that Rasmussen polling was correct in 2000 and 2004. While Rasmussen was very good in '04, in 2000 they were terrible. Their final poll on election day had Bush ahead nationally by 10 points. How can a pollster be ten points off?


17 posted on 01/17/2007 4:54:48 PM PST by joecolman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I wonder if more people are reading Mia T posts? OOPS, now I might trip over her when I'm in a local park.


18 posted on 01/17/2007 4:58:23 PM PST by bmwcyle (If no one buys illegal drugs, we win the war on drugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Don't peak too soon, Mia. You haven't seen the miracle of Chauncey Gardner that media whoredom will do for their goddess, her lowness.


19 posted on 01/17/2007 5:00:21 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Interesting analysis.

Do you think she would be forced to take a running mate with a military background?

20 posted on 01/17/2007 5:04:21 PM PST by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson