[Sun]

From the OP link:

"An aide to Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he is a co-sponsor of the amendment. That’s significant because not only is McConnell now minority leader in the Senate, but he’s also one of the Republican co-sponsors of S. 1."

Why would Sen. Mitch McConnel sign the original, S. 1, and then sign the amendment?

Did he see the error of his ways, or am I missing something?

[pctech]

Hmmmmm, good point. I wonder if Dobson has seen this as well.

[VOA]

Why would Sen. Mitch McConnel sign the original, S. 1, and then sign the amendment?

Did he see the error of his ways, or am I missing something?

I suspect it's because some of the Senators got their phone systems
in melt-down after Dobson put our an appeal earlier this week.

I can't remember the exact day (Tuesday?), but even though Dobson
and his co-host forgot to give out the phone number for calling
their Senators....
Dobson said a few days later that word had gotten back to him that
some of the Senate offices had their phone systems overloaded with
citizens calling in their displeasure with the censorship provision
of SB1.