Posted on 01/11/2007 9:10:14 PM PST by coloradan
Study of course also does not take into account the rate of gang on gang murders (think it accounted for something like 75% of murders) where both the victim and shooter were bad guys anyways.
Also the "study" didn't mention if they looked at all the murders or just gun murders. My bet is they looked at all murders and not only gun murders.
Horsehockey.
You take Detroit out of Michigan and you've got utopia.
I'll rephrase it for the writer and those in Rio Linda:
"American states where more people are liberals have higher murder rates."
They said "American states where more people own guns", not states where there is a higher percentage of gun owners. There is a big difference. There are probably more gun owners in a lot of the highly urbanized states where a lower percentage of homes are armed than in less populous states with a much higher percentage of armed homesteads. I also noted that there was no mention of which states fit into which category nor of the two center quartiles. This is IMHO a most carefully parsed and highly biased article.
"And if it's Obama...."
See my post #20.
It may be Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research...or both.
That number is way too low.
Very interesting. Don't you love Google. I hear the CIA uses it too. :)
Paging John R. Lott. You have a call on line one.
Not a very good way to do this kind of analysis. Different areas in different states have huge differences in homicide rates and gun ownership. A more precise way is to look at it county by county. They will find more guns equal less crime.
(b) The Anti-Gun Program seeks to drive small gun dealerships out of business by placing the firearms industry completely under consumer product health and safety oversight. It misrepresents the findings of research on gun-related deaths by failing to distinguish between gun-related deaths among inner-city gang members, where the death rates from shootings are astronomical, and gun-related deaths among members of the general population, which are relatively rare. As a result, it depicts gun violence as a national epidemic, thereby creating a perceived justification for what it hopes will be the erosion of Second Amendment rights.
Nice so they funded a study about something they are against. BIAS!!!! Well as if we didn't know that already.
They analyzed the data as 4 groups of states according the no. of households with firearms. DC probably ain't in there, or was used to slant VA, PA...
The only person I can trust with my guns is myself.
Definitely not any politicians.
"American states where more people are liberals have higher murder rates."
Not just higher murder rates but higher crime rates overall where liberals run things. There is also an interesting side effect:
http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/prison.htm
Thank God Al Gore invented the Internet!
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyce_Foundation :
Joyce Foundation ... creating a multitude of phony "grassroots" organizations to create the impression of a swell of support for gun control, when, in reality, the organizations may consist of only a few dozen members.
These are a few of the organizations that appear to be largely or completely funded by the Joyce Foundation:
* Firearms Law Center (now Legal Community Against Violence)
* Franklin County Prevention Institute
* Handgun Epidemic Lowering Plan (HELP) Network
* Indiana Partnership to Prevent Firearm Violence
* Legal Community Against Violence (formerly Firearms Law Center)
* Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence
* On-Target Coalition
* Violence Policy Center: $4,154,970 between 1996 and 2006.
* WAVE Educational fund
That's WAY too many lefties! Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.