Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minneapolis-St. Paul To Get Tough With Muslim Hacks Who Refuse Service . . . .
The Stiletto ^ | January 5, 2007 | The Stiletto

Posted on 01/05/2007 6:10:34 AM PST by theothercheek

Officials at Minneapolis-St. Paul International airport asked the Metropolitan Airport Commission for permission to hold public hearings on a proposal that would suspend the airport licenses of Muslim cab drivers who refuse service to passengers carrying alcohol or accompanied by service dogs. Each month, some 100 people are denied cab service at the airport on religious grounds, and the problem is getting worse, according to airport officials.

Drivers would have their airport licenses suspended 30 days for the first offense and revoked for two years after the second offense. The cabbies would be subject to the new penalties by May 11, when airport taxi licenses are scheduled for annual renewal.

Last year, the Metropolitan Airport Commission received a fatwa from the Muslim American Society of Minnesota that forbade taxi drivers from carrying passengers with alcohol so as to avoid "cooperating in sin according to Islam."

“Islam also considers the saliva of dogs to be unclean,” Hassan Mohamud, imam at Al-Taqwa Mosque of St. Paul, tells The Associated Press. Mohamud, who is also director of the Islamic Law Institute at the Muslim American Society of Minnesota, plans to petition airport officials to reconsider their proposal.

The First Amendment guarantees the right to practice one’s religion. It does not guarantee the right to drive a hack, or to refuse service to someone of a different faith, or to refuse service to someone who needs the assistance of a service animal. Muslim immigrants to the US are clearly unfamiliar with the American concept that “Your rights end where mine begin.” For more than 230 years, this guiding principle has protected our uniquely ecumenical and pluralistic country from the sectarian, ethnic and racial strife Muslims finance, stoke and engage in worldwide.

Instead of trumpeting trumped-up charges of “anti-Muslim backlash,” The Stiletto thinks the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) would better serve the Muslim community in America by educating them on religious tolerance, respecting the rights of others and showing compassion to a blind person shivering in the chill of the Minnesota winter waiting for a taxi who will take him and his dog home from the airport.

NOTE: Original source includes links to relevant articles and Web sites.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: cair; firstamendment; muslimintolerance; muslims; thestiletto; thestilettoblog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2007 6:10:36 AM PST by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Actually, I am in favor of a cab driver refusing service to anyone for any reason (unless he is an employee of a firm which has other rules), just as I believe any business can refuse to serve a customer. In Chicago, cab drivers are forced to take pick up unsavory characters and take them to dangerous locations. These cab drivers have been disarmed and helpless thanks to gun-control.


2 posted on 01/05/2007 6:16:15 AM PST by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Officials at Minneapolis-St. Paul International airport asked the Metropolitan Airport Commission for permission to hold public hearings on a proposal that would suspend the airport licenses of Muslim cab drivers who refuse service to passengers carrying alcohol or accompanied by service dogs.

So blind people with guide dogs would be refused service? So much for "Allah the Compassionate, the Merciful".

Regards, Ivan

3 posted on 01/05/2007 6:18:32 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
I understand the author's views on this. However, I am thinking that non-muslim drivers must be benefiting from the extra fares refused by the religion-of-peaceniks.

Maybe they should give away complimentary beer or wine to departing passengers as they exit.
4 posted on 01/05/2007 6:20:36 AM PST by auntyfemenist (Card carrying conservative, William F. Buckley fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Be sure to bring a bottle of hooch and shake it at them. Then you'll be sure to get a non-terrorist-supporting cabbie.


5 posted on 01/05/2007 6:21:34 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Heads up, people! The Nazis are back. They're more numerous and gearing up with atomic weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

Actually, I am in favor of a cab driver refusing service to anyone for any reason (unless he is an employee of a firm which has other rules), just as I believe any business can refuse to serve a customer.



That is what happened long long ago to blacks. Restaurant owners refused to serve them. Is that what you favor?


6 posted on 01/05/2007 6:21:57 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
“Islam also considers the saliva of dogs to be unclean,”

We dog lovers consider Islam to be unclean.

7 posted on 01/05/2007 6:21:57 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Heaven is home...I am just TDY here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

ping


8 posted on 01/05/2007 6:22:07 AM PST by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Whatever happened to the old-fashioned obnoxious loudmouthed American cab drivers?

I say yank their licences for a year on the first complaint.

No second chances or defenses/mitigating circumstances allowed.


9 posted on 01/05/2007 6:23:45 AM PST by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

There are no LIONS Clubs in Islamo-Facist countries.


10 posted on 01/05/2007 6:24:42 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

Are you nuts?

This is the kind of bigotry that gets us a bad name.


11 posted on 01/05/2007 6:24:49 AM PST by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

The problem is only a limited number of licenses are granted to haul passengers from airports. If muslims grab most of the licenses and serve only "sin free" fares we are in trouble- might as well be in Saudi Arabia.

Any hack gets a concession to serve "the public" at a state/federal funded facility- they must accomodate "the public". If they don't want to haul pork-chewing whisky toting infidels - they can drive a dfifferent concession route.


12 posted on 01/05/2007 6:26:23 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

You don't even need to go that far. You could just use my favorite moving boxes as luggage. When the Magslinger Compound changes location, I always go to a party store to pick up empty liquor boxes. They are free and because of the high cost of the original contents are always of very high quality.


13 posted on 01/05/2007 6:28:14 AM PST by magslinger (An open mind is like an outhouse. Sooner or later someone is going to fill it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
“Islam also considers the saliva of dogs to be unclean,” Hassan Mohamud, imam at Al-Taqwa Mosque of St. Paul, tells The Associated Press.

So here's a solution:

Don't allow the cab driver to French kiss the dogs.

Actually - I've also thought that dog's saliva was "unclean" - mainly due to their habit of licking their buttholes.

14 posted on 01/05/2007 6:31:27 AM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
The Stiletto thinks the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) would better serve the Muslim community in America by educating them on religious tolerance

I applaud the sentiment, but it will never happen. CAIR are interested only in stirring the pot and portraying themselves as the voice of all Muslims, the way MADD purports to speak for all victims of drunken driving. Both stances are erroneous, of course, but the bone-idle MSM somehow can't be bothered to expend any shoe leather and actually REPORT so they simply lean back in their chair and play dial-a-quote day after day. Most cabbies I've seen would never say no to a fare no matter what the circumstances but suddenly we've got religious purists driving. As passengers, should we call the cops and report their frequent dangerous/aggressive driving and constant chatter on cell phones?

15 posted on 01/05/2007 6:37:13 AM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Last year, the Metropolitan Airport Commission received a fatwa

Oh goodness, that's never a good thing.

16 posted on 01/05/2007 6:40:19 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson

Safety is a significant concern, but not on par with refusing a sober person carrying a bottle of wine. Slippery slope.


17 posted on 01/05/2007 6:40:50 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John D

Nice parallel. What about women in mini-skirts, men in skull caps, or kids snacking on pork laden slim jims???


18 posted on 01/05/2007 6:44:10 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Wilson
Actually, I am in favor of a cab driver refusing service to anyone for any reason (unless he is an employee of a firm which has other rules), just as I believe any business can refuse to serve a customer.

It is illegal to refuse service to someone with a service animal. It's called denying access and is a violation of state and federal law. A cab is considered public accomodation.

19 posted on 01/05/2007 6:50:38 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

I'm all for it. As a woman I have had very bad experiences with Muslim cab drivers. They are frightening and rude. They can't seem to get the idea that women are allowed to travel alone without a veil.

Once in Minnesota I had a cab driver that --- no kidding --- looked very much like Mohammed Atta, who glared at me, tore around the icy streets at high speed, almost snarled at me when I asked a question, seemed very agitated and angry to the point where I simply asked him to pull over and I got out and walked.

I would love to be able to avoid Muslim cab drivers carrying a big bag that says LIQUOR STORE or something. Hell I would wave a bottle of Johnny Walker at them to avoid getting into a cab with a Muslim driver.


20 posted on 01/05/2007 7:02:38 AM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson