Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gcruse

They lost me when they got to 'Revelations' :-), but Germany's role in the conflict was a 'revelation' for me:-)

WAR IN THE BALKANS
A fine mess

At the start of the crisis there were two main objectives: to restore substantive autonomy to Kosovo and ensure that the Yugoslav government respected the Kosovars’ political, cultural, religious and linguistic freedoms. The plan at the Rambouillet conference was to achieve these two aims by peaceful means. The Serbs and the Kosovars (including representatives of the Kosovan Liberation Army) had reached a consensus on the two main objectives. The Rambouillet conference ended in failure because of the West’s stubborn insistence (the United States in particular) on a Nato presence in Kosovo to monitor the implementation of the agreements.

By Ignacio Ramonet

Five weeks on from the start of the bombing in Yugoslavia, it is impossible not to be appalled at the extraordinary recklessness with which the Nato countries became involved in this latest Balkan conflict. They entered the war totally unprepared.

At the start of the crisis there were two main objectives: to restore substantive autonomy to Kosovo and ensure that the Yugoslav government respected the Kosovars’ political, cultural, religious and linguistic freedoms. The plan at the Rambouillet conference was to achieve these two aims by peaceful means. The Serbs and the Kosovars (including representatives of the Kosovan Liberation Army) had reached a consensus on the two main objectives and Slobodan Milosevic’s government had specifically agreed to grant Kosovo a large measure of autonomy. After free elections the province would have self-government, its own parliament, president, judicial system and police (1).

So why, when the two sides had agreed on the essentials, did the Rambouillet conference end in failure? There was one reason and one reason alone: the Western powers’ stubborn insistence (the United States in particular) on a Nato presence in Kosovo to monitor the implementation of the agreements. They were well aware that the Belgrade government would object (see article by Paul-Marie de La Gorce) and its all too predictable refusal was seen as a casus belli. There was no suggestion that other intervention forces might be used or, for instance, the United Nations’ "blue berets". The choice was between Nato or war. So war it was.

There is no denying that the Serbian government’s treatment of the ethnic Albanian majority in Kosovo was deplorable. In 1981 in particular the Kosovo Albanians (the only non-Slav and non-Christian group in former Yugoslavia) had protested violently against their status, which they regarded as discriminatory. The removal of that status in 1989 was a provocation. The Kosovar parliament was dissolved, the teaching of the Albanian language banned and over 150,000 Albanian-speakers were sacked from their jobs in the civil service and state-owned companies. Martial law was introduced, giving the Belgrade forces of repression a free hand. In the last ten years they have stepped up their persecution of the Albanians to persuade them to leave the country. Inevitably the Albanians rebelled.

Whereas Ibrahim Rugova’s supporters opted for passive resistance, the KLA militants became increasingly violent in their opposition. In the past two years they have carried out murderous attacks on the forces of law and order and the Serb minority. Such incidents, seized on by the mass media, have given government propagandists an excuse to play on Serbian nationalist sentiments and stir up racist feeling against the Albanians.

Like all Balkan geopolitical issues, the situation was clearly complex and had been going on for years. The search for a compromise was bound to be long and hard. That being so, the Rambouillet conference should have continued for several more weeks, especially since the few thousand OSCE (Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe) observers in Kosovo were to some extent keeping the violence against the Kosovars under control.

The lesson of history is that any ill-timed political changes in this explosive region set off a chain of consequences - as Milosevic’s unilateral removal of Kosovo’s and Vojvodina’s autonomous status in 1989 and the over-hasty recognition of Slovenian and Croatian independence by Germany and the Vatican in 1991 so tragically show. The Nato air offensive has once more made that lesson clear.

excerpt…

http://mondediplo.com/1999/05/01leader

A geostrategy for Eurasia by Zbigniew Brzezinski

http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/9709brzezinski.html


12 posted on 01/04/2007 10:22:58 PM PST by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: dgallo51
Your tagline has reminded me of something. Rwanda, Bosnia and Kosovo are the parts of the same script.

When Canadian judge started looking into rock solid evidence of direct involvement of BJ's administration into Rwanda events, she was thrown out from the Kangaroo court and sent back home to Canada. She was not suposed to look into that direction.

However, the irrefutable evidence is everywhere. When trained eye looks through the media smokescreen about Rwanda genocide, it is obvious: the involvement of CIA to kickstart the killing by shooting down French airplane, incursion of MPRI-trained Tutsi rebels from Uganda, stopping the intervention of African states, seeting up of Tutsi regime in Rwanda and military asstance in mass murder of 200,000 plus Hutus in Congo after Tutsis took over,

Today, Rwanda is leading exporter of Coltan, although none is mined in Rwanda. That's the only thing that counts.

Because of diversionary lie about "genocide in baaznia" no one noticed what really happened in Great Lake region in Africa.Gorillas are in the mist, but fools are in media smokescreen.

18 posted on 01/05/2007 11:07:16 AM PST by DTA (Mr. President., Condy is asleep at the wheel !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: dgallo51
"There is no denying that the Serbian government’s treatment of the ethnic Albanian majority in Kosovo was deplorable. In 1981 in particular the Kosovo Albanians (the only non-Slav and non-Christian group in former Yugoslavia) had protested violently against their status, which they regarded as discriminatory. The removal of that status in 1989 was a provocation. The Kosovar parliament was dissolved, the teaching of the Albanian language banned and over 150,000 Albanian-speakers were sacked from their jobs in the civil service and state-owned companies. Martial law was introduced, giving the Belgrade forces of repression a free hand. In the last ten years they have stepped up their persecution of the Albanians to persuade them to leave the country"

There are so many mistakes it's difficult to know where to start . The Kosovo Albanians could be educated in their own language , they could use their language in court . They weren't dismissed from their jobs , they were ordered to quit by the KLA They chose to have their kids educated outside the state system and then cried "Apartheid" .

Those Kosovo Albanians ( largely Catholic ) who stayed loyal to Belgrade sent their kids to school where they were educated in Albanian , their parents had state jobs , etc .

At Rambouillet the Serb side was represented by ethnic Turks , Ethnic Albanians ( four if I remember correctly ) Roma , Gorani , Ethnic Macedonian , etc .

Representing the Kosovo Albanians were........you guessed it ........only Kosovo Albanians .

Yet it was the Serbs who were labelled "racists"

21 posted on 01/05/2007 10:53:22 PM PST by infidel_pride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson