Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agency to Test Military Draft Machinery
Washington Post ^ | Thursday, December 21, 2006; 8:18 PM | KASIE HUNT

Posted on 12/21/2006 5:30:53 PM PST by rocksblues

WASHINGTON -- The Selective Service System is planning a comprehensive test of the military draft machinery, which hasn't been run since 1998.

The agency is not gearing up for a draft, an agency official said Thursday. The test itself would not likely occur until 2009.

Meanwhile, the secretary for Veterans Affairs said that "society would benefit" if the U.S. were to bring back the draft and that it shouldn't have any loopholes for anyone who is called to serve. VA Secretary Jim Nicholson later issued a statement saying he does not support reinstituting a draft.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Unclassified; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: democrat; draft; hopes; rangel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This is just a test!
1 posted on 12/21/2006 5:30:55 PM PST by rocksblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

We DON'T need a draft. We need higher paid, quality people and more of them. Our present membership are wonderful and we need more like them.


2 posted on 12/21/2006 5:36:45 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

I agree! I served from 1966 to 1970 and saw what kind of crap the military was forced to put up with and it was the main reason I did my 4 and got out!


3 posted on 12/21/2006 5:39:35 PM PST by rocksblues (Do unto others as they do unto you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

You are right. I served from '70-73. After we came back from Nam we were involved in some sort of test program to train the new all-voluntary Army. It was hell dealing with some of the draftees in combat situations. I emphasize *some* because the great majority were great . I wouldn't want to go up against our troops today for all the money in the world. They would have hicked our asses big time.


4 posted on 12/21/2006 5:44:53 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

I did 1965 to 1992 and experienced the difference. Give me volunteers please.


5 posted on 12/21/2006 5:48:30 PM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Thank you for your service!


6 posted on 12/21/2006 5:50:35 PM PST by rocksblues (Do unto others as they do unto you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Rangel will be there at the test just panting and panting, then slobbering, hoping then praying until snapping out of it when someone tells him it's only a test.


7 posted on 12/21/2006 5:52:50 PM PST by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

I do support the reinstitution of compulsory military service - - - - without exemptions. Those physically unable to serve in the military should be conscripted into some form of national service that fits within their capabilities. I have spoken to civic and professional clubs and associations on the subject. Knowing it is a fairly debatable subject and knowing the litany of objections and reasons against such a proposal, it isn't necessary to educate me on the unwisdom of my position. But, have at it if you choose.


8 posted on 12/21/2006 5:53:38 PM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: middie

All I will ask you is what would the military do with all the chicken-shit soldiers like JFnK.


9 posted on 12/21/2006 5:57:01 PM PST by rocksblues (Do unto others as they do unto you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
The agency is not gearing up for a draft, an agency official said Thursday.

If this is true, why do they need a test?

Smoke, meet fire.
10 posted on 12/21/2006 6:04:59 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

I thought I responded to this, but apparently not. If you begin with an invalid and universally unacceptable premise, all that follows is equally defective. In every group of mass conscripts there will be a discrete number who are unacceptable. Those in command are responsible for exercising it well and being leaders who handle the problems and create men of boys.


11 posted on 12/21/2006 6:46:41 PM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
...that it shouldn't have any loopholes for anyone who is called to serve.

Ha!

12 posted on 12/21/2006 6:51:33 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: middie

Obviously you never served.


13 posted on 12/21/2006 8:00:58 PM PST by rocksblues (Do unto others as they do unto you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: middie

Saw your home page and wish to retract my last post. But having people who do not want to serve coupled with elements in our society that want to destroy us will never work.


14 posted on 12/21/2006 8:03:51 PM PST by rocksblues (Do unto others as they do unto you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
This is stupid and a DEM spearheaded ( Charlie Rangle ) trick, which WILL backfire VERY badly!
15 posted on 12/21/2006 8:05:45 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: middie

Do you want girls conscripted too, as the Dems propose?


16 posted on 12/21/2006 8:07:46 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: middie

What about homosexuals and lesbians and trannies? Them too?


17 posted on 12/21/2006 8:09:01 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

NO..


18 posted on 12/21/2006 8:27:46 PM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Not worth a response--


19 posted on 12/21/2006 8:28:23 PM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: middie

Okay.


20 posted on 12/21/2006 8:33:43 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson