Posted on 12/20/2006 3:27:18 AM PST by NonLinear
A man who was being hunted for the murder of a policewoman is understood to have escaped from Britain by disguising himself as a veiled Muslim woman.
Mustaf Jama, a prime suspect in the fatal shooting of PC Sharon Beshenivsky, assumed his sister’s identity — wearing the niqab and using her passport — to evade supposedly stringent checks at Heathrow, according to police sources.
The use of the niqab, which leaves only a narrow slit for the eyes, highlights flaws in British airport security. At the time, Jama was Britain’s most wanted man, while Heathrow was on a heightened state of alert after the 7/7 terrorist atrocities in London five months previously.
The Times has learnt that British immigration officers rarely carry out a visual check to match a passport photograph with a departing female passenger’s veiled face.
Details of Jama’s disguise emerged yesterday as his younger brother, Yusuf, awaited a life sentence for the murder of the police officer, who died during an armed robbery at a Bradford travel agency in November last year.
Detectives believe that Jama, 26, was allowed to board an international flight from Heathrow because no attempt was made to uncover his face. While British baggage security is among the strictest in the world, the system of identity checks is considered less rigorous than in countries such as France.
At the time of his escape, between Christmas Day last year and New Year’s Day, the 26-year-old Somali national, who had 21 criminal convictions, was the most wanted man in Britain. His photograph had been circulated to every police force, port and airport in the country after the bungled robbery in which PC Beshenivsky died and her colleague, PC Teresa Milburn, was seriously wounded.
David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, called for an urgent inquiry into the security breach. “The idea that in any circumstan-ces you could be let through passport control wearing a veil is barely credible,” he said. “Doing so when an all-persons bulletin for murder has been issued demonstrates that our borders are not just porous — they are non-existent.”
A Home Office spokesman confirmed yesterday that although immigration control staff had the power to ask people to remove the veil to prove their identity, it is not an automatic policy. The only visual checks at an airport that should always be made in relation to departing pasengers are at check-in and at the boarding gate. In each case, the task is the responsibility of the relevant airline. A BAA Heathrow spokesman said yesterday:
“Immigration control staff always do a visual check on people coming into the country but only random checks are made with outgoing passengers.”
The Times understands that police investigating the Beshenivsky murder received speci-fic intelligence about Jama’s veiled escape from what is regarded as a very reliable source. Jama — who made £600 from the robbery — is thought to be under armed protection in a semi-lawless region of Somalia where his family wields considerable influence.
The Times can also reveal that Jama’s father, who was once a Somali MP, is a cousin of Mohamed Siad Barre, the country’s former President who seized power in a 1969 military coup and led a brutal dictatorship until he was toppled in 1991. The wanted man’s uncle is the country’s former Foreign Minister.
Approaches have been made by Britain to the transitional Government in Somalia, which has offered its co-operation in any attempt to detain and extradite Jama but is understood to have minimal influence in the region where he is hiding.
The news adds to the controversy over the wearing of the veil in Britain. The debate was sparked in October when Jack Straw revealed that he asked Muslim women to remove the niqab before meetings in his Blackburn constituency. Tony Blair later described the veil as “a mark of separation”.
In October The Times revealed that a male suspect in a major anti-terrorist investigation evaded capture in Britain for several days by dressing in a burka. He was eventually arrested and is awaiting trial.
The full-face veil has regularly been used as a disguise in Iraq and Afghanistan by Islamist fighters, including several suicide bombers and at least one senior al-Qaeda leader.
Deeper and deeper.
How manly of him! Hiding inside his sister's niqab.
It's the mooslime way! Either they hide in it or behind it! allah is a cowardly liar!
It's hard to put a finger on what these idiots deem sacred.
For the record, we all KNOW this isn't the first time that has happened, and won't be the last. A FIX needs to come that may angst some of those women in veils.
I'm starting to think most of these guys wear the veil behind closed doors, they have a warped concept of honor and manhood.
It's funny about the Muzzie fascination with veiled women. During Biblical times, hookers were veiled in order to hide their identity (and wares) from prospective clients until they showed them the shekels.
Yet Muzzies insist on dressing up their women like whores.
Real muslim beyatch
Only people with something nefarious to hide wear masks.
The Burka Bettys of the world need to lose the veil or just not go out in public. It's that simple.
They wouldn't need a veil if their men weren't so ignorant, depraved, misogynistic and insecure about others seeing them in public.
Lose the Burka. It's nothing but a mask to hide the wearer's identity.
Again, the error of putting too much effort into identifying the weapons, and too little on identifying the terrorists.
Too much P.C.-stop respecting a psuedo religion that is nothing but a cover for terrorism.
If we are not yet at war with islam, it is obvious that we soon will be. Why don't we act proactively now?
It's sacred if a non-muslim looks at it, touches it, gets near it, walks on it, shoots at it, etc, etc, etc, and a muslim doesn't like what was done. And it is probably the "most sacred" whatever in islam.
In many states in the south being masked is illegal because of the Klan. Would wearing a buraka be covered under the same law?
Burka, sorry forgot to spell check.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.