"Nice to hear that, and don't give me Wikipeida stuff"
It's groan inducing, having to read arguments from people who think that taking a quick gander at WIKIPEDIA ( FFS ) is research.
Red6, do yourself a favour and read the ICTY TRANSCRIPTS to, for example, the Milosevic case ( about 50,000 pages ) , the Kyle case ( 10,000 pages ) the Blagojevic and Jokic case ( another 10,000 odd pages ) before you embarrass yourself with WIKI F*&&^%G PEDIA
FFS
Post 28:
["The real liars are having a hard time in court."]
Oric didn't have such a "hard time in court."
Think before you write.
Post 31:
["You're right! I'll think a lot harder before I post the next time."]
Nice to hear that, and don't give me Wikipeida stuff.
Use your own head...but of course I may be asking too much.
***What part of he was “CONVICTED” is hard for you to understand? YOU ARE WRONG understand? Wrong, as in definitively 100% factually provable incorrect in your statement that he the court case went his way. Even when I attempts to sarcastically get my point across to you it goes right over your head! So I'll be more blunt: You are full of shit. Oric was found guilty.
Let me repost it, in the hopes that you might get it the third or fourth time you read it.
"As of March 16, 2006, the ICTY had indicted 161 persons. Only six of these remained "at large". The cases against 85 of the indicted had been concluded: 43 were found guilty, 8 acquitted, 25 had their indictments withdrawn, and six had died - 3 of these in custody, 3 while on parole. Four cases had been sent to national courts for trial. 15 of those convicted had completed their sentences and been released by March 2006.[1] (
http://www.un.org/icty/glance-e/index.htm )